Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
WotC announces plans for 4e SRD and OGL
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 3982462" data-attributes="member: 2067"><p>I kind of agree, however I don't think this can really stop the radically-diverged product.</p><p></p><p>You could still release, say, Mutants and Masterminds, with the text "Fully compatible with the 4th Edition of the world's most popular role playing game!" You wouldn't be able to reference the exact rules, but you don't really need to most of the time. If your product is radically diverged, most of the exact rules would have to be changed anyway, ya?</p><p></p><p>Especially if the SRD is more guidelines, less specific stats, you wouldn't often be able to point back to it, anyway. And since that defines what content is open, if it's not in the SRD, all you CAN do is reference it obliquely. </p><p></p><p>It makes it more awkward, but not impossible. Game mechanics, after all, aren't copyrighted (IIRC), and I could still make a 4e-compatible product that used the basic 4e rules (3 tiers, at-will/per-encounter/per-day abilities, d20 vs. a DC, etc) without ever having to reference anything that Wizards has claim over. More difficult, and requiring more careful footwork, but still possible in an Arcana Unearthed kind of way, where you dance around D&Disms, invent your new isms, and make things with substantially similar rules that don't vary any more than your nearest house-ruled campaign will.</p><p></p><p>And there's the mention of future, broader OGLs and SRDs coming down the pipe, too. The d20 Modern might be more generic. And the community could always publish an "IP-Free" OGL and SRD of their own that doesn't reference D&D in any kind of way. </p><p></p><p>But those last are all kind of dreamland material. Practically, what this means is that publishers who want to to crazy creative stuff right out the gate can either go the "Arcana Unearthed" route of oblique references and slightly different rules, or can just wait and see if future OGL/SRD pairings will be more suited to their product (Spycraft and M&M, for instance, might be better off using the d20 Modern version).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 3982462, member: 2067"] I kind of agree, however I don't think this can really stop the radically-diverged product. You could still release, say, Mutants and Masterminds, with the text "Fully compatible with the 4th Edition of the world's most popular role playing game!" You wouldn't be able to reference the exact rules, but you don't really need to most of the time. If your product is radically diverged, most of the exact rules would have to be changed anyway, ya? Especially if the SRD is more guidelines, less specific stats, you wouldn't often be able to point back to it, anyway. And since that defines what content is open, if it's not in the SRD, all you CAN do is reference it obliquely. It makes it more awkward, but not impossible. Game mechanics, after all, aren't copyrighted (IIRC), and I could still make a 4e-compatible product that used the basic 4e rules (3 tiers, at-will/per-encounter/per-day abilities, d20 vs. a DC, etc) without ever having to reference anything that Wizards has claim over. More difficult, and requiring more careful footwork, but still possible in an Arcana Unearthed kind of way, where you dance around D&Disms, invent your new isms, and make things with substantially similar rules that don't vary any more than your nearest house-ruled campaign will. And there's the mention of future, broader OGLs and SRDs coming down the pipe, too. The d20 Modern might be more generic. And the community could always publish an "IP-Free" OGL and SRD of their own that doesn't reference D&D in any kind of way. But those last are all kind of dreamland material. Practically, what this means is that publishers who want to to crazy creative stuff right out the gate can either go the "Arcana Unearthed" route of oblique references and slightly different rules, or can just wait and see if future OGL/SRD pairings will be more suited to their product (Spycraft and M&M, for instance, might be better off using the d20 Modern version). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
WotC announces plans for 4e SRD and OGL
Top