Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Parmandur" data-source="post: 9087996" data-attributes="member: 6780330"><p>Well, per their official statement, these pieces would have been sub.itted for review 18 months ago, which is before AI art really broke out. We know that Emi Tanni is who reviewed these, along with the dozens of other pieces in the book. She is pretty new to being the art director rather than a lower level graphic designer, and thisnis new tech, so given the timeframes and that the results honestly look like funky photoshop more than AI art (since it was an AI touch up job), I can easily see it as an editorial oversight due to taking a longtime collaborater at his word.</p></blockquote><p></p>