Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Justice and Rule" data-source="post: 9089180" data-attributes="member: 6778210">I mean largely circumstantial, but I've been pretty open that this is my personal feels. Though I feel also it's just as valid as everyone trying to claim this was an innocent mistake. I mean, we know that the D&amp;D side of things did not previously have the same sort of aversion to AI art that MTG does because MTG actually banned it. This has been noted by multiple artists even though it doesn't seem to be a public statement:[MEDIA=twitter]1687910309304885248[/MEDIA]The lack of these tells me that they either didn't choose a side or were at least somewhat open to the idea. I also still believe that it is hard to look at those pictures and not at least know something is up. God help me, I'd like to think they are more competent than that, because that human with what kind of resembles a bow poking through the muddled stump that might be a closed hand is... well, it feels insulting that they didn't know.And honestly, I kind of don't really see a difference given that other companies have taken an active stance on this (including their other major brand!); not taking a stance and allowing it to happen through laziness is just as bad as planning it. I just choose to believe this was an active experiment, even if it were a small one, rather than them being so lazy that they are letting that sort of stuff pass through.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Justice and Rule, post: 9089180, member: 6778210"] I mean largely circumstantial, but I've been pretty open that this is my personal feels. Though I feel also it's just as valid as everyone trying to claim this was an innocent mistake. I mean, we know that the D&D side of things did not previously have the same sort of aversion to AI art that MTG does because MTG actually banned it. This has been noted by multiple artists even though it doesn't seem to be a public statement: [MEDIA=twitter]1687910309304885248[/MEDIA] The lack of these tells me that they either didn't choose a side or were at least somewhat open to the idea. I also still believe that it is hard to look at those pictures and not at least know [I]something[/I] is up. God help me, I'd like to think they are more competent than that, because that human with what kind of resembles a bow poking through the muddled stump that might be a closed hand is... well, it feels insulting that they didn't know. And honestly, I kind of don't really see a difference given that other companies have taken an active stance on this (including their other major brand!); not taking a stance and allowing it to happen through laziness is just as bad as planning it. I just choose to believe this was an active experiment, even if it were a small one, rather than them being so lazy that they are letting that sort of stuff pass through. [/QUOTE]

Verification