Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="LordEntrails" data-source="post: 7700067" data-attributes="member: 6804070">I have an ethical obligation to know before I give my consent (even consent given through failing to oversee). I never said it was the sole responsibility of one party. I've said from the beginning it both parties responsibility.What information that is relevant to this discussion is not available to everyone? All local, state, and federal laws are available to every citizen. Even if cumbersome to access. More importantly, if I do not have access to the information that I need to make an informed decision, and I make that decision in ignorance, who's fault is that?This victim blaming paragraph caught me short. And rather than walking away from such, this will be my last post on this thread until sometime tomorrow (at the earliest). It seems to be getting too emotional. And the paraphrasing of my views in the statement are so off from what I have posted as to be meaningless.Companies do illegal things all the time for business reasons that are also immoral. They also do moral things that are illegal all the time. But that's not being presented. Nor do either situations matter. I have yet to see any reason to believe that WotC knew the judges program was illegal. To assume so is ... not worth discussing. To discuss the possible implications if WotC knew, might be interesting. But so would the discussion if the judges knew.So every-time I am wronged it is moral for me to sue someone? I agree that it's legal. But that's not the discussion. So, if someone unintentionally harms me, I should harm them?</blockquote>

Verification