Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
WotC Being Sued By Magic: the Gathering Judges
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dire Bare" data-source="post: 7700076" data-attributes="member: 18182"><p>I agree that viewing the suing MtG judges as unethical is a bit warped, and I hope their lawsuit is successful.</p><p></p><p>However, I wouldn't characterize WotC's role as lying to the judges, or somehow willfully taking advantage of them. Gaming cons, competitions, and tournaments have a long history of being volunteer run, because gaming is an industry that started at the grass-roots level and volunteerism is really the only way gaming tournaments could have been run in the old days. WotC and MtG has long outgrown that, IMO, and shouldn't be using volunteers anymore to run their tournaments . . . but for them to continue doing things as they always have is somewhat understandable, until it's made clear to them this isn't going to work in today's environment.</p><p></p><p>My assumption is that the judges suing WotC realized that the responsibilities they were given, and how they were treated by WotC, really put them in the category of unpaid employee rather than volunteer, and so most likely DID approach WotC first to try and change that situation. WotC has been using volunteers since day one, and why give that up to spend more money paying people fairly, especially when volunteers are likely somewhat plentiful? The judges likely saw that as putting profits over people (as do I), while WotC likely saw things differently. I doubt folks at WotC feel like they are taking advantage of the judges (at least, I hope not!). So, to court we go! Two opposing parties, both feeling in the right, happen all the time in court battles, of course.</p><p></p><p>Hopefully WotC will see the light, either through a settlement or forced by court order. This WILL change how cons and tournaments are run, but mostly on the highest levels. Cons and tournaments that need to continue relying on volunteers (because they are small-time) will need to be careful how much responsibility they put on their volunteers, and larger cons/tournaments will need to step up and actually hire some folks to shoulder the enormous amount of work required.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dire Bare, post: 7700076, member: 18182"] I agree that viewing the suing MtG judges as unethical is a bit warped, and I hope their lawsuit is successful. However, I wouldn't characterize WotC's role as lying to the judges, or somehow willfully taking advantage of them. Gaming cons, competitions, and tournaments have a long history of being volunteer run, because gaming is an industry that started at the grass-roots level and volunteerism is really the only way gaming tournaments could have been run in the old days. WotC and MtG has long outgrown that, IMO, and shouldn't be using volunteers anymore to run their tournaments . . . but for them to continue doing things as they always have is somewhat understandable, until it's made clear to them this isn't going to work in today's environment. My assumption is that the judges suing WotC realized that the responsibilities they were given, and how they were treated by WotC, really put them in the category of unpaid employee rather than volunteer, and so most likely DID approach WotC first to try and change that situation. WotC has been using volunteers since day one, and why give that up to spend more money paying people fairly, especially when volunteers are likely somewhat plentiful? The judges likely saw that as putting profits over people (as do I), while WotC likely saw things differently. I doubt folks at WotC feel like they are taking advantage of the judges (at least, I hope not!). So, to court we go! Two opposing parties, both feeling in the right, happen all the time in court battles, of course. Hopefully WotC will see the light, either through a settlement or forced by court order. This WILL change how cons and tournaments are run, but mostly on the highest levels. Cons and tournaments that need to continue relying on volunteers (because they are small-time) will need to be careful how much responsibility they put on their volunteers, and larger cons/tournaments will need to step up and actually hire some folks to shoulder the enormous amount of work required. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
WotC Being Sued By Magic: the Gathering Judges
Top