Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
WotC Being Sued By Magic: the Gathering Judges
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 7700174" data-attributes="member: 22779"><p>Yeah, I'm not really buying it. There's far too many presumptions being made here. "Someone yelled at me, can I get money" might be a real question, but, for 99% of the time, the answer is, "no". End of story. It's not like someone lobotomized lawyers and judges en mass. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But, again, isn't that for the courts to decide? If WotC was doing something that violates labour laws, then isn't suing them the responsible thing to do? And, isn't it for the courts to decide if WotC was, in fact, doing something that violates labour laws? After all, if the Magic judges just walk away, and WotC is, in fact, doing something wrong, nothing prevents them from continuing to violate labour laws. </p><p></p><p>Now, if it was a minor technicality and WotC wasn't aware of it, that will also come out. OTOH, if WotC was fully aware of the violation, that should come out too. And, it should come out that WotC didn't do anything wrong. There are multiple possible results here. But, none of those results would be possible if no one actually stands up and says, "Hey, this is wrong". </p><p></p><p>Now, just saying, "this is wrong" doesn't make it so. Of course. But, again, that's for a judge to decide, not you or me. None of us has the slightest clue of the actual facts of the case, so, we're just tossing out ideas. But, the notion that the suit is automatically frivolous, as [MENTION=23751]Maxperson[/MENTION] contends, is completely without basis. It might be. And that will come out. It might go a lot of different ways.</p><p></p><p>But, claims that it is somehow unethical to seek redress when you believe you have been wronged is just bizarre. The whole point of civil law is to decide this sort of thing. Was the person (or people) in fact wronged in some way, and what should be done to redress that wrong? It's baffling to me to think that this specific complaint is automatically unethical just because they volunteered for something. If, and please, take note of that if, WotC was violating labour laws by creating a volunteer position, then not redressing that would be unethical. If WotC is taking advantage, illegally, of volunteers, then that needs to be addressed. </p><p></p><p>Notions of "well, I said yes to X, therefore anything that happens after that is my own responsibility" is a moral black hole.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 7700174, member: 22779"] Yeah, I'm not really buying it. There's far too many presumptions being made here. "Someone yelled at me, can I get money" might be a real question, but, for 99% of the time, the answer is, "no". End of story. It's not like someone lobotomized lawyers and judges en mass. But, again, isn't that for the courts to decide? If WotC was doing something that violates labour laws, then isn't suing them the responsible thing to do? And, isn't it for the courts to decide if WotC was, in fact, doing something that violates labour laws? After all, if the Magic judges just walk away, and WotC is, in fact, doing something wrong, nothing prevents them from continuing to violate labour laws. Now, if it was a minor technicality and WotC wasn't aware of it, that will also come out. OTOH, if WotC was fully aware of the violation, that should come out too. And, it should come out that WotC didn't do anything wrong. There are multiple possible results here. But, none of those results would be possible if no one actually stands up and says, "Hey, this is wrong". Now, just saying, "this is wrong" doesn't make it so. Of course. But, again, that's for a judge to decide, not you or me. None of us has the slightest clue of the actual facts of the case, so, we're just tossing out ideas. But, the notion that the suit is automatically frivolous, as [MENTION=23751]Maxperson[/MENTION] contends, is completely without basis. It might be. And that will come out. It might go a lot of different ways. But, claims that it is somehow unethical to seek redress when you believe you have been wronged is just bizarre. The whole point of civil law is to decide this sort of thing. Was the person (or people) in fact wronged in some way, and what should be done to redress that wrong? It's baffling to me to think that this specific complaint is automatically unethical just because they volunteered for something. If, and please, take note of that if, WotC was violating labour laws by creating a volunteer position, then not redressing that would be unethical. If WotC is taking advantage, illegally, of volunteers, then that needs to be addressed. Notions of "well, I said yes to X, therefore anything that happens after that is my own responsibility" is a moral black hole. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
WotC Being Sued By Magic: the Gathering Judges
Top