Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
WotC Boards
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="woodelf" data-source="post: 955606" data-attributes="member: 10201"><p>When i first got an account, the first think i did was go through the control panel to turn off/on a bunch of stuff (i don't want to use messageboard personal messages, frex), and i looked at the various styles. It didn't even occur to me that the styles might actually present different content, so all i looked at was how easy to read, how easy to navigate (obvious breaks between posts, frex), and color scheem. I'll have to poke around--on first pass, this was the only one that was easy to read--the default drives me batty. I can handle light-on-black, but not yellow-on-black or white-on-black. And a screen full of black makes my head hurt after a couple of hours--light, bland colors are good. ;-)</p><p></p><p>Thanks for the diagnosis.</p><p></p><p><em>edit:</em> What is it with geeks and low-contrast? Or, in general, lousy color theory? (Things like using a more eye-catching color for unimportant stuff than for important stuff.) The Red style would be acceptable, if it weren't red--that is, the style is fine, the contrast and readability are great, except for the actual choice of color. Do the same exact style with, say, two shades of blue-green, or blue, and you'd have a winner. Silver, like Exposed, is quite readable. Not quite as good, but at least the message body is high-contrast--it's only the header info which is low-contrast, and that's actually a point in its favor (makes it easy to not read it, which is what you do most of the time). But it doesn't even seem to include timestamps, much less date-n-timestamps, so it's even worse. As for the default, and several others: if you're going to put light text on dark background, any design book will tell you that you have to use heavier strokes--bold all the text, at the very least. I'm not sure whether i'll go for readable, and just not care how old posts are, or go for info, and make my head hurt. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /> </p><p></p><p>Am i really that weird to want a date/timestamp on messages? I'm genuinely surprised that ,of all the info they could include or exclude, any messageboard style would exclude *that* info. Does anybody else look at the date on posts?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="woodelf, post: 955606, member: 10201"] When i first got an account, the first think i did was go through the control panel to turn off/on a bunch of stuff (i don't want to use messageboard personal messages, frex), and i looked at the various styles. It didn't even occur to me that the styles might actually present different content, so all i looked at was how easy to read, how easy to navigate (obvious breaks between posts, frex), and color scheem. I'll have to poke around--on first pass, this was the only one that was easy to read--the default drives me batty. I can handle light-on-black, but not yellow-on-black or white-on-black. And a screen full of black makes my head hurt after a couple of hours--light, bland colors are good. ;-) Thanks for the diagnosis. [i]edit:[/i] What is it with geeks and low-contrast? Or, in general, lousy color theory? (Things like using a more eye-catching color for unimportant stuff than for important stuff.) The Red style would be acceptable, if it weren't red--that is, the style is fine, the contrast and readability are great, except for the actual choice of color. Do the same exact style with, say, two shades of blue-green, or blue, and you'd have a winner. Silver, like Exposed, is quite readable. Not quite as good, but at least the message body is high-contrast--it's only the header info which is low-contrast, and that's actually a point in its favor (makes it easy to not read it, which is what you do most of the time). But it doesn't even seem to include timestamps, much less date-n-timestamps, so it's even worse. As for the default, and several others: if you're going to put light text on dark background, any design book will tell you that you have to use heavier strokes--bold all the text, at the very least. I'm not sure whether i'll go for readable, and just not care how old posts are, or go for info, and make my head hurt. :confused: Am i really that weird to want a date/timestamp on messages? I'm genuinely surprised that ,of all the info they could include or exclude, any messageboard style would exclude *that* info. Does anybody else look at the date on posts? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
WotC Boards
Top