Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
WOTC Business Strategy and miniatures
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Anubis the Doomseer" data-source="post: 1004801" data-attributes="member: 12455"><p>Item 1 and 3 are both okay (actually the reality of 3 is iffy - the crunch books are usually bought by players looking for a third-party power boost). Step 2, from the position of Hasbro is rather unfortunate.</p><p></p><p>1. The mini market is honestly too small a subset of gamers to really risk the investment.</p><p>2. You are already dealing with a highly over-supplied market. Discounting for a moment those mini lines on sale to support wargaming (Games Workshop, MageKnight) you are still dealing with more than a dozen companies ranging from the individual artist/sculptor (see next point) to mid-sized rpg companies.</p><p>3. The quality of existing product from rival groups is, quite frankly, of several orders of magnitude better than the proposed minis for D&D. This will always be the case since individual artists, who are selling directly from their homepages, manufacture smaller quantities, some will even custom build minis. And from my anceodtal experience with mini enthusiasts - quality is all-important.</p><p>4. The pricing scheme Wizards will have to undertake to make this profitable is a non-starter. Their marketing model - the randomized packs, is even less attractive. Your competitors, Topps/MageKnight excluded, are allowing their customers to buy exactly what they want - no figgling with rarities, random packs, etc.</p><p>5. I can't see why you contend that "minatures sell to everybody" when the average player will only need to buy a single miniature - the iconic representation of their character. It is the DM who must buy minis and counters for the monsters, NPCs, cohorts, and others in the campaign. Following this logic (that minis are a primarily DM-driven sales product) and the existing business model (that such optional DM-targeted product be supplied by third-parties who can take the risk and operate on the appropriate scale to match the consumer base), Hasbro's idea of producing miniatures is a contradiciton in its own business model.</p><p>6. Last point. There isn't enough unique in D&D to really require its own set of minis. Outside a couple of iconic creatures (which companies, such as REAPER, skirt with generic variations - e.g. 'spider-centaurs' and 'vulture-demons'), why should I buy (or need to buy) Hasbro-specific miniatures when Ral Partha, Reaper, etc all produce the same thing - bearded human wizard with staff?</p><p></p><p>All in all Hasbro is going into an already flooded market, their target consumer base already buys from the competitors who already support your particular rulesset/setting/genre with made-to-order or reasonably-priced, high-quality product, the size of the market and the nature of its desires makes the existing announced business model very unusual and likely a failure, and the quality of the announced product is below the existing average.</p><p></p><p>In short, the move does not make sense from the point of view of such a large corporation. Better to simply add a bit of support for mini/counter play in the rules and let the third party supply the miniatures.</p><p></p><p>- Ma'at</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Anubis the Doomseer, post: 1004801, member: 12455"] Item 1 and 3 are both okay (actually the reality of 3 is iffy - the crunch books are usually bought by players looking for a third-party power boost). Step 2, from the position of Hasbro is rather unfortunate. 1. The mini market is honestly too small a subset of gamers to really risk the investment. 2. You are already dealing with a highly over-supplied market. Discounting for a moment those mini lines on sale to support wargaming (Games Workshop, MageKnight) you are still dealing with more than a dozen companies ranging from the individual artist/sculptor (see next point) to mid-sized rpg companies. 3. The quality of existing product from rival groups is, quite frankly, of several orders of magnitude better than the proposed minis for D&D. This will always be the case since individual artists, who are selling directly from their homepages, manufacture smaller quantities, some will even custom build minis. And from my anceodtal experience with mini enthusiasts - quality is all-important. 4. The pricing scheme Wizards will have to undertake to make this profitable is a non-starter. Their marketing model - the randomized packs, is even less attractive. Your competitors, Topps/MageKnight excluded, are allowing their customers to buy exactly what they want - no figgling with rarities, random packs, etc. 5. I can't see why you contend that "minatures sell to everybody" when the average player will only need to buy a single miniature - the iconic representation of their character. It is the DM who must buy minis and counters for the monsters, NPCs, cohorts, and others in the campaign. Following this logic (that minis are a primarily DM-driven sales product) and the existing business model (that such optional DM-targeted product be supplied by third-parties who can take the risk and operate on the appropriate scale to match the consumer base), Hasbro's idea of producing miniatures is a contradiciton in its own business model. 6. Last point. There isn't enough unique in D&D to really require its own set of minis. Outside a couple of iconic creatures (which companies, such as REAPER, skirt with generic variations - e.g. 'spider-centaurs' and 'vulture-demons'), why should I buy (or need to buy) Hasbro-specific miniatures when Ral Partha, Reaper, etc all produce the same thing - bearded human wizard with staff? All in all Hasbro is going into an already flooded market, their target consumer base already buys from the competitors who already support your particular rulesset/setting/genre with made-to-order or reasonably-priced, high-quality product, the size of the market and the nature of its desires makes the existing announced business model very unusual and likely a failure, and the quality of the announced product is below the existing average. In short, the move does not make sense from the point of view of such a large corporation. Better to simply add a bit of support for mini/counter play in the rules and let the third party supply the miniatures. - Ma'at [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
WOTC Business Strategy and miniatures
Top