Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="NaturalZero" data-source="post: 7775286" data-attributes="member: 55705">I really like the core 5e system. I like the streamlined math. One place where they absolutely dropped the ball and kicked it down the <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />ing street was when they went away from the 4e monster statblock that included everything you needed to run the monster. They went back and gave monsters spell lists, with rules on multiple pages... in an entirely different book! It was one of the reasons i hated running high level caster monsters in 3.5 and always truncated or altered the mechanics to be more forward.Yes, yes, yes. I like running 5e as a system, but the more i do, the more i notice how many evolutionary enhancements that 4e proposed that worked better but got chucked out the window. I'd like a concise 4e statblock, with flowery 5e prose and world-building flavor.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="NaturalZero, post: 7775286, member: 55705"] I really like the core 5e system. I like the streamlined math. One place where they absolutely dropped the ball and kicked it down the :):):):)ing street was when they went away from the 4e monster statblock that included everything you needed to run the monster. They went back and gave monsters spell lists, with rules on multiple pages... in an entirely different book! It was one of the reasons i hated running high level caster monsters in 3.5 and always truncated or altered the mechanics to be more forward. Yes, yes, yes. I like running 5e as a system, but the more i do, the more i notice how many evolutionary enhancements that 4e proposed that worked better but got chucked out the window. I'd like a concise 4e statblock, with flowery 5e prose and world-building flavor. [/QUOTE]

Verification