Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
WotC CS answers some Stealth and Shadow Walk questions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="clearstream" data-source="post: 4400495" data-attributes="member: 71699"><p>The next question you'll need to decide on is <em>does fluff rule over crunch?</em> You have to decide that, because in RAW there is no guide as to which actions can be performed stealthily and which can't. My view is that I don't mind my shy n00b having as much fun as my Drama-major vet; so bottom line I say yes or no based on their having cover or concealment and spending an action. Of course, like anyone I'll rule out nonsense <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p> </p><p>That's why I put in my posted rulings that you can stealth with a minor action. That doesn't mean I envision anyone saying 'I <em>stretch up on tippy-toe humming the bee song... and hide'</em> unless they're Tinkerbell.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>A move of 0 has been 'clarified' by WotC as permitted. It's possibly needed in conjunction with some powers, or perhaps it's just a pro forma.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>You identify here one of the pivotal decisions DMs have to make about stealth. Line one of the Stealth rules block on PHB188 reads '<em>Part of whatever action you are trying to perform stealthily</em>'. Doing a bit of forensic reading, the positioning of that line as the opening article of the mechanics block marks it out for special attention. It should key your intentional stance toward everything that follows.</p><p> </p><p>The only <em>mechanical </em>consequence of successful stealth use is under the Success caption. <em><strong>'You</strong> avoid notice, unheard and hidden from view. If you <strong>later</strong> attack or shout, you're no longer hidden.'</em> Here's where the issue is. Line one should have read 'Your action...' instead of 'You', and line two should not contain 'later'. Later cannot be contained to 'later, during this action', but includes 'later, after this action'.</p><p> </p><p>Taken together with the white section preamble, many people adduce the wording in support of a lasting hidden condition. I've offered two takes on it</p><p> </p><p><strong>A lasting hidden condition</strong> here <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?t=237063" target="_blank">http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?t=237063</a></p><p> </p><p>and</p><p> </p><p><strong>only with the action</strong> here</p><p><a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?t=236566" target="_blank">http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?t=236566</a></p><p> </p><p>Which is right? You'll have to decide. Meanwhile I'm penning an open letter to WotC to urge them to pick one.</p><p> </p><p>-vk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="clearstream, post: 4400495, member: 71699"] The next question you'll need to decide on is [I]does fluff rule over crunch?[/I] You have to decide that, because in RAW there is no guide as to which actions can be performed stealthily and which can't. My view is that I don't mind my shy n00b having as much fun as my Drama-major vet; so bottom line I say yes or no based on their having cover or concealment and spending an action. Of course, like anyone I'll rule out nonsense :) That's why I put in my posted rulings that you can stealth with a minor action. That doesn't mean I envision anyone saying 'I [I]stretch up on tippy-toe humming the bee song... and hide'[/I] unless they're Tinkerbell. A move of 0 has been 'clarified' by WotC as permitted. It's possibly needed in conjunction with some powers, or perhaps it's just a pro forma. You identify here one of the pivotal decisions DMs have to make about stealth. Line one of the Stealth rules block on PHB188 reads '[I]Part of whatever action you are trying to perform stealthily[/I]'. Doing a bit of forensic reading, the positioning of that line as the opening article of the mechanics block marks it out for special attention. It should key your intentional stance toward everything that follows. The only [I]mechanical [/I]consequence of successful stealth use is under the Success caption. [I][B]'You[/B] avoid notice, unheard and hidden from view. If you [B]later[/B] attack or shout, you're no longer hidden.'[/I] Here's where the issue is. Line one should have read 'Your action...' instead of 'You', and line two should not contain 'later'. Later cannot be contained to 'later, during this action', but includes 'later, after this action'. Taken together with the white section preamble, many people adduce the wording in support of a lasting hidden condition. I've offered two takes on it [B]A lasting hidden condition[/B] here [URL]http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?t=237063[/URL] and [B]only with the action[/B] here [URL]http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?t=236566[/URL] Which is right? You'll have to decide. Meanwhile I'm penning an open letter to WotC to urge them to pick one. -vk [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
WotC CS answers some Stealth and Shadow Walk questions
Top