Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Rhianni32" data-source="post: 4294763" data-attributes="member: 68272">I'm certainly not opposed to errata and rule fixes that are broken. That would be a defective product.&nbsp; But they already post errata.&nbsp; Any books that have come out that haven't had errata definately should.A compilation of past questions should be made available thats no big deal. Again though its just a book. Its not going to have new patches for vulnerabilities and generate new errors that new errata would be needed for. Also rules that are broken. Big difference from liking the way it works.But to spend active resources (payroll on customer service employees) to give OPINIONS on rules for a system that doesnt generate revenue doesnt make sense economically. How many pages of message boards go into debates about a ruling where both sides have valid points? Opinions never end. Thats a big part of the GMs job is making a ruling and moving on.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Rhianni32, post: 4294763, member: 68272"] I'm certainly not opposed to errata and rule fixes that are broken. That would be a defective product. But they already post errata. Any books that have come out that haven't had errata definately should. A compilation of past questions should be made available thats no big deal. Again though its just a book. Its not going to have new patches for vulnerabilities and generate new errors that new errata would be needed for. Also rules that are broken. Big difference from liking the way it works. But to spend active resources (payroll on customer service employees) to give OPINIONS on rules for a system that doesnt generate revenue doesnt make sense economically. How many pages of message boards go into debates about a ruling where both sides have valid points? Opinions never end. Thats a big part of the GMs job is making a ruling and moving on. [/QUOTE]

Verification