Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
WoTC feels unfairly treated in the ENnies?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nisarg" data-source="post: 1741181" data-attributes="member: 19893"><p>Hi, </p><p></p><p>In the now-famous Morrus rant, he claimed that WoTC didn't enter the ENnies because they felt that their products would not be given a fair treatment. It was also Morrus' opinion that this feeling was unfounded.</p><p></p><p>So, I would like to know now whether WoTC really feels this way, but it seems unlikely to be confirmable unless someone who is currently working at WoTC would come on here and confirm this.</p><p></p><p>Until then, let's assume its true; this raises another important question: could it be a legitimate feeling?</p><p></p><p>During the thread discussing how to change the ENnies, someone at one point made the insinuation that the current voting system does not take quantity of votes into account at all, and that this was done on purpose so that Wizards wouldn't have an "unfair" advantage. I asked on there if this meant that an unknown product that gets a single "10" vote would beat a product that got 1000 "9" votes, but no one ever answered to confirm or deny this. </p><p></p><p>If this is true, I could CERTAINLY see how WoTC would feel that the current Ennies system is biased against them, and it would appear to me that in the effort to make sure WoTC doesnt' "sweep" the people running these awards went too far, making a grading system that gives all the advantages to Wizards-enemies (who'll vote 1 for the products regardless of worth) and no consideration to WoTC's greatest virtue, the fact that it is more loved by more gamers than any other company out there!</p><p></p><p>So, IS this how the ennies currently work? If not, does the current scoring system, however it works, one that inherently demonstrates an anti-wizards bias, or intentionally sets out to make the awards favoritist to lesser-known products at the expense of being a realistic reflection of the current market?</p><p></p><p>Nisarg</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nisarg, post: 1741181, member: 19893"] Hi, In the now-famous Morrus rant, he claimed that WoTC didn't enter the ENnies because they felt that their products would not be given a fair treatment. It was also Morrus' opinion that this feeling was unfounded. So, I would like to know now whether WoTC really feels this way, but it seems unlikely to be confirmable unless someone who is currently working at WoTC would come on here and confirm this. Until then, let's assume its true; this raises another important question: could it be a legitimate feeling? During the thread discussing how to change the ENnies, someone at one point made the insinuation that the current voting system does not take quantity of votes into account at all, and that this was done on purpose so that Wizards wouldn't have an "unfair" advantage. I asked on there if this meant that an unknown product that gets a single "10" vote would beat a product that got 1000 "9" votes, but no one ever answered to confirm or deny this. If this is true, I could CERTAINLY see how WoTC would feel that the current Ennies system is biased against them, and it would appear to me that in the effort to make sure WoTC doesnt' "sweep" the people running these awards went too far, making a grading system that gives all the advantages to Wizards-enemies (who'll vote 1 for the products regardless of worth) and no consideration to WoTC's greatest virtue, the fact that it is more loved by more gamers than any other company out there! So, IS this how the ennies currently work? If not, does the current scoring system, however it works, one that inherently demonstrates an anti-wizards bias, or intentionally sets out to make the awards favoritist to lesser-known products at the expense of being a realistic reflection of the current market? Nisarg [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
WoTC feels unfairly treated in the ENnies?
Top