Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="GreyLord" data-source="post: 9328848" data-attributes="member: 4348">5e is terrible at this.Superman only has a 20% greater chance than I do...because he only gets a +4 more on his legendary than anyone else.Unless, of course, they decide to change this someway in the republished 5e.A Master only has a 10% chance of being better than I am at their job...unless they happen to be a Rogue...then it can be 30%.5e math is incredibly small in relation to how different people are in certain arenas.Gandalf could easily be level 20 with what he does.&nbsp; He'd have more spells and such already, and we've seen him do things that could technically be equal to a teleport or even a wish, or if we classify him as a druid or cleric (how else does one turn Sauron or other great evils?) he still has high level manifestations of his power.As for everything else...in 5e...it's a mere +4 better than the &quot;apprentices&quot;...so why&nbsp; not?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="GreyLord, post: 9328848, member: 4348"] 5e is terrible at this. Superman only has a 20% greater chance than I do...because he only gets a +4 more on his legendary than anyone else. Unless, of course, they decide to change this someway in the republished 5e. A Master only has a 10% chance of being better than I am at their job...unless they happen to be a Rogue...then it can be 30%. 5e math is incredibly small in relation to how different people are in certain arenas. Gandalf could easily be level 20 with what he does. He'd have more spells and such already, and we've seen him do things that could technically be equal to a teleport or even a wish, or if we classify him as a druid or cleric (how else does one turn Sauron or other great evils?) he still has high level manifestations of his power. As for everything else...in 5e...it's a mere +4 better than the "apprentices"...so why not? [/QUOTE]

Verification