Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9333921" data-attributes="member: 6801228">My explanation wasn't meant for races that don't have weapon proficiencies. Again, you may as well ask why an Elf can be a five hundred year old mage and only level 1. Any explanation you give falls apart if you then also introduce a one hundred year old elf mage who is level 10.Which is different than &quot;you are ignoring my arguments and only using strawmen&quot; that you accused me of before. You also, consistently, have ignored me bringing up Elves, Hobgoblins, and Githyanki. You ONLY want to argue this in terms of Mountain Dwarves, nothing else.Which still does not match your earlier accusations, and does nothing to change the fact that you are now telling me to back off and stop debating your preferences.... when you started the debate.Yeah, exactly. You started this. I engaged, now you want me to stop. All because you decided that an explanation that works for the people the rule is for, doesn't work for the people the rule doesn't apply to.Goliaths who get a +2/+1? I'm not following this. And, fine, Mountain Dwarf isn't legacy like I thought. So it was just poorly designed.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 9333921, member: 6801228"] My explanation wasn't meant for races that don't have weapon proficiencies. Again, you may as well ask why an Elf can be a five hundred year old mage and only level 1. Any explanation you give falls apart if you then also introduce a one hundred year old elf mage who is level 10. Which is different than "you are ignoring my arguments and only using strawmen" that you accused me of before. You also, consistently, have ignored me bringing up Elves, Hobgoblins, and Githyanki. You ONLY want to argue this in terms of Mountain Dwarves, nothing else. Which still does not match your earlier accusations, and does nothing to change the fact that you are now telling me to back off and stop debating your preferences.... when you started the debate. Yeah, exactly. You started this. I engaged, now you want me to stop. All because you decided that an explanation that works for the people the rule is for, doesn't work for the people the rule doesn't apply to. Goliaths who get a +2/+1? I'm not following this. And, fine, Mountain Dwarf isn't legacy like I thought. So it was just poorly designed. [/QUOTE]

Verification