Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Maxperson" data-source="post: 9334006" data-attributes="member: 23751">They aren't miniscule.&nbsp; The differences between those divine necromancers I mentioned are significant.&nbsp; And I have several ways to achieve it in 3e and 0 ways in 5e.&nbsp; There are no divine necromancers in 5e.No. It's not a matter of taste to say that 3e has far more ways mathematically to achieve a far greater variety of concepts than 5e does.&nbsp; That's objective math.&nbsp; Where preference plays into it is if you're okay with far fewer options and character concepts that you can achieve. If you don't mind limiting yourself to the far fewer ways 5e presents, then that's great. If your concepts are like mine and are more detailed, 5e simply cannot possibly achieve many of them. It doesn't have enough variety to do so.&nbsp; When it comes to character generation, I prefer a system that allows me to actually achieve the concepts I envision.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Maxperson, post: 9334006, member: 23751"] They aren't miniscule. The differences between those divine necromancers I mentioned are significant. And I have several ways to achieve it in 3e and 0 ways in 5e. There are no divine necromancers in 5e. No. It's not a matter of taste to say that 3e has far more ways mathematically to achieve a far greater variety of concepts than 5e does. That's objective math. Where preference plays into it is if you're okay with far fewer options and character concepts that you can achieve. If you don't mind limiting yourself to the far fewer ways 5e presents, then that's great. If your concepts are like mine and are more detailed, 5e simply cannot possibly achieve many of them. It doesn't have enough variety to do so. When it comes to character generation, I prefer a system that allows me to actually achieve the concepts I envision. [/QUOTE]

Verification