Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
WotC: Get Rid of the Tactical Encounter Format
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 3943898" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>It sucks!</p><p></p><p>I've heard that WotC has a new encounter format for 4E. I do not know what it is called. However, if it is anything like the Tactical Encounter Format, they should get rid of it.</p><p></p><p>I have been running Eyes of the Lich Queen for about 10 weeks or so now. It is a pretty good adventure. Except for the Tactical Encounter Format.</p><p></p><p>With it, one has to flip back and forth from the descriptive section to the tactical section. Sometimes, the treasure is listed in one section. Sometimes, it is listed in the other. Sometimes, descriptive information about the location is in one section, sometimes in the other.</p><p></p><p>ARRRGGGGHHHH!!!!</p><p></p><p>Give it a rest WotC. Each tactical section can be immediately after the descriptive section in the module. If a DM is doing a high level read of the module out of game, he can skip past each tactical section and come back later.</p><p></p><p>But during the game, it is a pain in the rump to flip back and forth from one to the other. It is real easy to miss something, especially for DMs who do not have a photographic memory and forgot some tidbit that they read earlier on when they were prepping for the session.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The information in each section is basically ok (although they beef up the tactical section with white noise, just to get it to fit on a page), but having them in multiple sections is a pain.</p><p></p><p>In fact, some of the directly related information (like the clues in the journal and the map) in this particular module are spread out over 4 or 5 different sections. That's real difficult to find during the game.</p><p></p><p></p><p>WotC. Try to organize your information better. Having each encounter in one section each might not be perfect, but it is a lot better than having it in two different sections.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 3943898, member: 2011"] It sucks! I've heard that WotC has a new encounter format for 4E. I do not know what it is called. However, if it is anything like the Tactical Encounter Format, they should get rid of it. I have been running Eyes of the Lich Queen for about 10 weeks or so now. It is a pretty good adventure. Except for the Tactical Encounter Format. With it, one has to flip back and forth from the descriptive section to the tactical section. Sometimes, the treasure is listed in one section. Sometimes, it is listed in the other. Sometimes, descriptive information about the location is in one section, sometimes in the other. ARRRGGGGHHHH!!!! Give it a rest WotC. Each tactical section can be immediately after the descriptive section in the module. If a DM is doing a high level read of the module out of game, he can skip past each tactical section and come back later. But during the game, it is a pain in the rump to flip back and forth from one to the other. It is real easy to miss something, especially for DMs who do not have a photographic memory and forgot some tidbit that they read earlier on when they were prepping for the session. The information in each section is basically ok (although they beef up the tactical section with white noise, just to get it to fit on a page), but having them in multiple sections is a pain. In fact, some of the directly related information (like the clues in the journal and the map) in this particular module are spread out over 4 or 5 different sections. That's real difficult to find during the game. WotC. Try to organize your information better. Having each encounter in one section each might not be perfect, but it is a lot better than having it in two different sections. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
WotC: Get Rid of the Tactical Encounter Format
Top