Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jack99" data-source="post: 4072776" data-attributes="member: 53135">*casts Death Ward to protect himself from the negative energy pervading Derren's posts.My dear neighbor to the south. Why is everything always a worst case scenario with you? You base your post on the title of the book, because it includes a "I". Sure, that could mean there will be a II, a III, a IV and quite possibly a V. However, how about just a I and a II? Is that perhaps more likely, considering there are two major types of dragons, the metallic and the chromatic?And where is this dragon-fatigue that you mention? As we say online, screenshot or it didn't happen!But back to the content, and the multiple books issue. In Third Edition, which is, as far as I remember, your frame of reference, we had a two books in a serie, about demons and devils. If they can write two books on devils and demons, surely the dragon, which is the most iconic monster in DND, by far, can fill two books on it's own? AFAIK, they never said the dragons would be more alike, just that they wouldn't be adhering to the rigid alignment restrictions of past editions, thus making them more unpredictable. This unpredictability is maybe what they need to explore in the books, giving them more options, more interesting angles to use the dragons for.</blockquote>