Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
WotC has a milking machine now (Draconomicon I)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dm4hire" data-source="post: 4073790" data-attributes="member: 14848"><p>I can kind of see Epoch's stance here about the cutting of classes and races, it makes it sound incomplete by turning around and saying they'll be in another source book. The classes and races in 3.5 were pretty much everything from 3.0 and 2.0 and for the most part 1st with a few exceptions and a couple of additions.</p><p></p><p>I think if WotC would have actually got player input instead of saying, "well we talked to our 'playtesters' and all the players who talked with us at conventions and this is what we came up with." Those playtesters and players tend to be the same people every convention. They weren't the entire player base. A small percentage doesn't represent the entire community. WotC should have announced, "Hey we're going to come out with a new edition. We want your input. Answer these questions in Dragon or Dungeon mailing them in, fill out our surveys at conventions, or go to our website and take the survey there." They could have even just disguised it by doing surveys about different parts. True they have product surveys in their books but those aren't comprehensive and most people are ticked about them because they glue them in the middle of their book. Then they should have set a finite number of responses to wait on or at least a decent period of response time to get more accurate responses, say 3-6 months. Pour over the data and post the results so you get even more feed back (i.e. 75% prefer Tiefling over Gnomes or this is the ranking of the races).</p><p></p><p>Instead we have what we have now. People asking what happened to my class/race and why? I don't mind they asked playtesters or players at conventions, but if you post a summery stating "The following survey was taken with 10,000 responses sent in and this is the results." Most people won't argue those kind of numbers. Just telling me you asked playtesters or players at conventions doesn't cut it when you could be talking about 20 or 30 people. No one can argue against it like I said if the majority of us turn around and ask "well I did the survey did you?" Cause I know everyone on here would have taken a survey if they'd know about it. It would have been on every message board and group on and off line.</p><p></p><p>If you give the people what they want they will be happy and keep quiet. If you don't ask them what they want you find yourself facing the guillotine asking "What? Was there something wrong with the cake?" So take note WotC for 5.0, do a survey before cutting things out.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dm4hire, post: 4073790, member: 14848"] I can kind of see Epoch's stance here about the cutting of classes and races, it makes it sound incomplete by turning around and saying they'll be in another source book. The classes and races in 3.5 were pretty much everything from 3.0 and 2.0 and for the most part 1st with a few exceptions and a couple of additions. I think if WotC would have actually got player input instead of saying, "well we talked to our 'playtesters' and all the players who talked with us at conventions and this is what we came up with." Those playtesters and players tend to be the same people every convention. They weren't the entire player base. A small percentage doesn't represent the entire community. WotC should have announced, "Hey we're going to come out with a new edition. We want your input. Answer these questions in Dragon or Dungeon mailing them in, fill out our surveys at conventions, or go to our website and take the survey there." They could have even just disguised it by doing surveys about different parts. True they have product surveys in their books but those aren't comprehensive and most people are ticked about them because they glue them in the middle of their book. Then they should have set a finite number of responses to wait on or at least a decent period of response time to get more accurate responses, say 3-6 months. Pour over the data and post the results so you get even more feed back (i.e. 75% prefer Tiefling over Gnomes or this is the ranking of the races). Instead we have what we have now. People asking what happened to my class/race and why? I don't mind they asked playtesters or players at conventions, but if you post a summery stating "The following survey was taken with 10,000 responses sent in and this is the results." Most people won't argue those kind of numbers. Just telling me you asked playtesters or players at conventions doesn't cut it when you could be talking about 20 or 30 people. No one can argue against it like I said if the majority of us turn around and ask "well I did the survey did you?" Cause I know everyone on here would have taken a survey if they'd know about it. It would have been on every message board and group on and off line. If you give the people what they want they will be happy and keep quiet. If you don't ask them what they want you find yourself facing the guillotine asking "What? Was there something wrong with the cake?" So take note WotC for 5.0, do a survey before cutting things out. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
WotC has a milking machine now (Draconomicon I)
Top