Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WotC Invites You To Explore the World of Greyhawk
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DrunkonDuty" data-source="post: 9488628" data-attributes="member: 54364"><p>I think the reason any given campaign setting resonates with any given person is due to whatever conceits that that campaign setting has. And certainly "humanocentric" is a long established conceit of Greyhawk. I have to say it's not one I've personally ever much cared about. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Look, we're old. Old-ish. We like things the way they were. Us, and every generation of old farts that has come before. But this is a new product for a new generation. If it's got differences to previous versions of the product, so be it. We can grumble about it if we want. </p><p></p><p>For me, humanocentric could be dilluted by the addition of a half dozen non-human nations. Or even, and I know I won't make many friends saying this, turn some of those existing nations into confederations* of various peoples. E.g.: given it's location I can easily see Furyondy being a human/elven confederation. Veluna even more so.</p><p></p><p>* By confederation I mean that the incoming Oeridian (etc) tribes merged with the pre-existing peoples to form states. This allows for politically influential nobles of various species in some/many/all of the new states. We have precedents (Snarf, I'm sure you love a good precedent) for such confederations. The Uleks are human/nonhuman and several states are confederations of various human tribes.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In full agreement here.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I agree one doesn't need to. But what does "sense" have to do with it? Do you mean internally cohesive? We (well, WotC) are making a fantasy world. It can have whatever internal cohesion it requires written into it.</p><p></p><p>A version of Greyhawk I did up I would go with Dragonborn being associated with the old Baklunish Empire and thus have any states they formed be much further north. Yeomanry as a dragonborn state wouldn't make for internal cohesion in my Greyhawk. Ket would though. But that's just me.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, in agreement. </p><p></p><p>Also, I did notice you used deus ex <em>machina</em> when mentioning Warforged. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DrunkonDuty, post: 9488628, member: 54364"] I think the reason any given campaign setting resonates with any given person is due to whatever conceits that that campaign setting has. And certainly "humanocentric" is a long established conceit of Greyhawk. I have to say it's not one I've personally ever much cared about. Look, we're old. Old-ish. We like things the way they were. Us, and every generation of old farts that has come before. But this is a new product for a new generation. If it's got differences to previous versions of the product, so be it. We can grumble about it if we want. For me, humanocentric could be dilluted by the addition of a half dozen non-human nations. Or even, and I know I won't make many friends saying this, turn some of those existing nations into confederations* of various peoples. E.g.: given it's location I can easily see Furyondy being a human/elven confederation. Veluna even more so. * By confederation I mean that the incoming Oeridian (etc) tribes merged with the pre-existing peoples to form states. This allows for politically influential nobles of various species in some/many/all of the new states. We have precedents (Snarf, I'm sure you love a good precedent) for such confederations. The Uleks are human/nonhuman and several states are confederations of various human tribes. In full agreement here. I agree one doesn't need to. But what does "sense" have to do with it? Do you mean internally cohesive? We (well, WotC) are making a fantasy world. It can have whatever internal cohesion it requires written into it. A version of Greyhawk I did up I would go with Dragonborn being associated with the old Baklunish Empire and thus have any states they formed be much further north. Yeomanry as a dragonborn state wouldn't make for internal cohesion in my Greyhawk. Ket would though. But that's just me. Again, in agreement. Also, I did notice you used deus ex [I]machina[/I] when mentioning Warforged. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WotC Invites You To Explore the World of Greyhawk
Top