Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 5274690" data-attributes="member: 996">Well, I never whined for any of those things... ;(But, I'm particularly concerned about 'less errata.'&nbsp; I want exactly as much errata as it takes to fix problems with published material.&nbsp; If something's broken or nonsensical or worthless, I don't want it to stay that way because they're &quot;trying to avoid too much errata.&quot;&nbsp; Now, 'less errata' in the sense of less /needed/ because there's more quality going in, I could get behind - if that's achievable.&nbsp; The longer a game like this is out, the more likely each new element is to interact in a broken way with something that has come before.&nbsp; Tying their own hands when it comes to fixing such mistakes would be bad.OTOH, if they really /had/ gotten into a system of putting out broken stuff so that the munchkin set would run out an buy it, letting them have their fun with it for a few months then issuing errata and releasing a new book with more broken stuff....&nbsp;&nbsp; well, I suppose on a moral level I won't mind seeing that go.... but it sure seemed like a sweet model to me.&nbsp; They got to sell books, and we (eventually) got good material.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 5274690, member: 996"] Well, I never whined for any of those things... ;( But, I'm particularly concerned about 'less errata.' I want exactly as much errata as it takes to fix problems with published material. If something's broken or nonsensical or worthless, I don't want it to stay that way because they're "trying to avoid too much errata." Now, 'less errata' in the sense of less /needed/ because there's more quality going in, I could get behind - if that's achievable. The longer a game like this is out, the more likely each new element is to interact in a broken way with something that has come before. Tying their own hands when it comes to fixing such mistakes would be bad. OTOH, if they really /had/ gotten into a system of putting out broken stuff so that the munchkin set would run out an buy it, letting them have their fun with it for a few months then issuing errata and releasing a new book with more broken stuff.... well, I suppose on a moral level I won't mind seeing that go.... but it sure seemed like a sweet model to me. They got to sell books, and we (eventually) got good material. [/QUOTE]

Verification