Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="justanobody" data-source="post: 4566401" data-attributes="member: 70778">WOW! 40 other people after me commeted on the actual things mentioned in the podcast, and yet somehow you were to first wanting to comment on me personally. I don't know what interest some people have in my personally, but let me go ahead and get this out of the way. I am not here for dating or anything else, so keep your personal affections to yourselves.Now to address things on topic to thiis thread, which you failed to do in any way with your post; I will explain the portions of my post to you that you attempted to quote and missed the context.First I will start with the last port of my post, that you are quoting from.Here you can tell that I was making the post over the time it took to listen to the podcast and it was what I was thinking at the time it was actually being said. That means I couldn't tell the future to know what was going to be said next while typing on what I was hearing at that moment I was typing and hearing it.Here you can read into it whatever you want. I heard something about Birthright in regards to homebrew and gave my opinion on the matter. Are you saying I don't have the right to my own opinion, and in your oppressive world must subscribe to each and every one of your beliefs? No? Then I stand by what I said, and you can do with that information whatever you please. Birthright sucks. Don't emulate it.You post took things out of context, probably because you failed to read to the end of my post, which I have already provided for you at the beginning of this post with explanation in case you missed it the first time.The fungible talk went on and put me to sleep or was otherwise uninterested, so I just trailed off until I heard something that did interest me to listen to which happened to be healing surges.Here I agree with either Dave or Mike that says power gamers are jerks. If you have a problem with that statement then you should take it up with them.I don't care how long you have been here nor how many posts you have made, but if you are interested in some kind of silly game like that, then I have already addressed that 40+ other users that posted in this thread after my initial post posted on the material brought up in the podcast. So since you were the first to post on me personally, what right do you have to judge any of my actions or posts. Should you be awarded with a Gold Star for attempting to derail a thread? One for being blatantly off-topic? Or any other of reasons that you had to not post anything about the subject of the thread itself, but instead chose to post about me?NOW......I think the disarming ideas presented here are pretty good, and don't know how to really add them back myself, but think it really is something missing as a valid tactic in combat that should belong to a game that is...you know...at least partially combat.I don't think a stun status should be involved for one losing a weapon unless it is sundered because of the impact, but again something needs to allow for both of those avenues of play, and I missed disarm on my first listen of the podcast, and have not gone back and listened since or would have included it in my initial post.So someone start up a thread about adding disarm/sunder back into fourth with some good ideas so the mental forces here can adapt something for use!</blockquote>

Verification