Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[WOTC] Minis Spotlight
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DWARF" data-source="post: 928838" data-attributes="member: 863"><p>They're probably 1' circles so you can turn them in more than 4 directions.</p><p></p><p>-Tortoise--"WOTC knows the market pretty well with regard to these minis."</p><p></p><p>Sure they do, and they knew the market when they came out with chainmail too...</p><p></p><p>-Kanegrundar--"I still say that a lot of people are looking at it from the wrong angle. WotC tried to go toe to toe with Reaper and GW and lost, so now they are hitting a market that is not as tried and true as others, the pre-painted minis market. "</p><p></p><p>So now they're taking on Heroclix and MageKnight in a less tried market? They're still trying to break into a market that may very well be saturated, and they're secondary "use for DnD games" idea may be soured by the random packaging.</p><p></p><p>Look, if a secondary market develops, that means that people will be trading or buying/selling their figures. And what does that mean? Each figure will have a cost associated with it based on it's rarity and demand. So goblins will be cheap, while mind flayers will be expensive.</p><p></p><p>[sarcasm]Wait a minute.... that sounds familiar. The common mass-produced ones will be cheap while the rarer ones will be more expensive. Hey, isn't that what WotC said would happen if they packeged the miniatures seperately instead of in a big pack?[/sarcasm]</p><p></p><p>So what's the point? The point is to get us into the re-buying cycle. Someone buys packs and packs of krenshars and pixies in the hope they get a mind flayer or dragon. And they're trying to tell us it's good for us?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DWARF, post: 928838, member: 863"] They're probably 1' circles so you can turn them in more than 4 directions. -Tortoise--"WOTC knows the market pretty well with regard to these minis." Sure they do, and they knew the market when they came out with chainmail too... -Kanegrundar--"I still say that a lot of people are looking at it from the wrong angle. WotC tried to go toe to toe with Reaper and GW and lost, so now they are hitting a market that is not as tried and true as others, the pre-painted minis market. " So now they're taking on Heroclix and MageKnight in a less tried market? They're still trying to break into a market that may very well be saturated, and they're secondary "use for DnD games" idea may be soured by the random packaging. Look, if a secondary market develops, that means that people will be trading or buying/selling their figures. And what does that mean? Each figure will have a cost associated with it based on it's rarity and demand. So goblins will be cheap, while mind flayers will be expensive. [sarcasm]Wait a minute.... that sounds familiar. The common mass-produced ones will be cheap while the rarer ones will be more expensive. Hey, isn't that what WotC said would happen if they packeged the miniatures seperately instead of in a big pack?[/sarcasm] So what's the point? The point is to get us into the re-buying cycle. Someone buys packs and packs of krenshars and pixies in the hope they get a mind flayer or dragon. And they're trying to tell us it's good for us? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[WOTC] Minis Spotlight
Top