Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Faolyn" data-source="post: 9629978" data-attributes="member: 6915329">No, I don't watch RPG-creator youtubers. I read articles, from multiple sources.But you pretty much addressed the issue in your first sentence there: &quot;they won't break your leg if they work for wizards.&quot; That if is carrying all the weight here. Sure, WotC isn't going to hire them to break legs--WotC has made dumb, greedy mistakes but they're not actively evil--but that's their reputation. WotC made mistake of hiring an organization with the reputation of breaking legs. The fact that WotC didn't tell them to go break legs in this particular case (or for all we know, actively told them not to break legs) doesn't give WotC any points.They can't hire an organization (especially when they had many other options) with that sort of reputation and not expect people to get upset with that choice.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Faolyn, post: 9629978, member: 6915329"] No, I don't watch RPG-creator youtubers. I read articles, from multiple sources. But you pretty much addressed the issue in your first sentence there: "they won't break your leg [B]if [/B]they work for wizards." That [I]if [/I]is carrying all the weight here. Sure, WotC isn't going to hire them to break legs--WotC has made dumb, greedy mistakes but they're not actively evil--but that's their reputation. WotC made mistake of hiring an organization with the reputation of breaking legs. The fact that WotC didn't tell them to go break legs in this particular case (or for all we know, actively told them [I]not [/I]to break legs) doesn't give WotC any points. They can't hire an organization (especially when they had [I]many [/I]other options) with that sort of reputation and not expect people to get upset with that choice. [/QUOTE]

Verification