Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="wicked cool" data-source="post: 9750700" data-attributes="member: 85714">There seems to be real buzz/hooe/excitement from critics regarding exodus so that sort of potentially turns this entire argument on its head Second regarding bg4. We don’t know who/what studio will write this etc. say as an example they had obsidian make it. Obsidian has a mixed track record but with time and money it’s a solid gamble. And no offense but a lot of this is a gamble on wotc partEa/bioware and Bethesda are both studios with big money that for the most part have seemed to f up after a big game Skyrim-my opinion their best game and everything else that has come after isn’t as good. Also scary that no studio has been able to be the next Skyrim (fall of Avalon was just mentioned but it’s not in the same ballpark)BioWare-inquisition is one of the most unique games out there. There isn’t any other game that falls into the fast/rpg with the character depth/cutscenes character creation etc etc. Witcher 3 is very different and probably the closest. BioWare developers were given time and a boat load of cash and 3 tiles after inquisition were total bombs. Beautiful bombs but bombshell nevertheless. Poor management and writing led to that .. on veilguard there were early signs and people discounted the online YouTubers that have millions of followers each including some that played the game before release telling the rest of us it’s just not very goodMany are saying games like exodus and expanse are the new mass effectsWotc just cancelled some video game project that sort of looked like inquisition. For some reason they thought it didn’t meet their standards. I think that’s positive as opposed to BioWare/bethesda releasing games like veilguard that didn’t meet standards!</blockquote>

Verification