Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WotC Removes Digital Content Team Credits From D&D Beyond
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LordEntrails" data-source="post: 9427106" data-attributes="member: 6804070"><p>Oh, because you personally have never allowed a thread to veer anywhere close to being off topic? Or posted anything in any thread here on ENWorld that is even remotely tangential? </p><p></p><p>Besides, industry standard practice for giving contributor credit certainly IS related to this thread. It may not be the OP or the title, but by ENWorld standards, as enforced by the mods, my question certainly is appropriate for this thread.</p><p></p><p>I know you don't like me personally, you have made that clear time and again. But perhaps it would be better if we just did not engage with each other except when we have something positive to add to the other's views.</p><p></p><p>That's one of the most unreasonable assertions I've ever heard. Just because I don't know a subject doesn't mean I can't point out obvious logical fallacies in opinions about a topic. It's one very well documented and esteemed methods for learning a topic critically rather than just taking someone else's opinion as fact or inviolate.</p><p></p><p>Really? I asked over and over again. It wasn't until Desert Gled finally gave an answer that did not have glaring logical flaws in it that I stopped asking. And perhaps you noticed my genuine appreciation to them for doing so? Or do you so color every post I make that you can never even consider I'm as genuine as I say I am?</p><p></p><p>The hypotheticals are there for a simple reason, to point out the flaws in the poor and inadequate answers people had been providing up to the point of Desert's response. They are there because they help illustrate a point. When you ask someone to educate you and they give you answer that has flaws in it, it is aggressive to point out those flaws?</p><p></p><p>Actually you know, in some cultures it is. But in many cultures it is not. Yes there are flaws in both approaches, but I think ENWorld states that open and honest discussion is valued. Not shutting down discussion on a topic because someone doesn't understand the reasoning. As you like to say, you don't have to reply to someone if you don't want to.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LordEntrails, post: 9427106, member: 6804070"] Oh, because you personally have never allowed a thread to veer anywhere close to being off topic? Or posted anything in any thread here on ENWorld that is even remotely tangential? Besides, industry standard practice for giving contributor credit certainly IS related to this thread. It may not be the OP or the title, but by ENWorld standards, as enforced by the mods, my question certainly is appropriate for this thread. I know you don't like me personally, you have made that clear time and again. But perhaps it would be better if we just did not engage with each other except when we have something positive to add to the other's views. That's one of the most unreasonable assertions I've ever heard. Just because I don't know a subject doesn't mean I can't point out obvious logical fallacies in opinions about a topic. It's one very well documented and esteemed methods for learning a topic critically rather than just taking someone else's opinion as fact or inviolate. Really? I asked over and over again. It wasn't until Desert Gled finally gave an answer that did not have glaring logical flaws in it that I stopped asking. And perhaps you noticed my genuine appreciation to them for doing so? Or do you so color every post I make that you can never even consider I'm as genuine as I say I am? The hypotheticals are there for a simple reason, to point out the flaws in the poor and inadequate answers people had been providing up to the point of Desert's response. They are there because they help illustrate a point. When you ask someone to educate you and they give you answer that has flaws in it, it is aggressive to point out those flaws? Actually you know, in some cultures it is. But in many cultures it is not. Yes there are flaws in both approaches, but I think ENWorld states that open and honest discussion is valued. Not shutting down discussion on a topic because someone doesn't understand the reasoning. As you like to say, you don't have to reply to someone if you don't want to. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WotC Removes Digital Content Team Credits From D&D Beyond
Top