Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
WotC Replies: Statements by WotC employees regarding Dragon/Dungeon going online
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kigmatzomat" data-source="post: 3471681" data-attributes="member: 9254"><p>Amusing, but futile. No significant number of gamers are going to boycott 4e for the simple fact that they will want to <em><strong>see</strong></em> 4e before they make a judgement. I am personally expected to become a "d20" player (or whatever license-free name gets applied to R/SRD based games) after 4e comes out....but I'm still very likely to buy the 4e core books.</p><p></p><p>This is/was a huge PR gaffe. The worst part is that WotC has shown this is a <em>consistent</em> approach they take to handling the market. Look at E-Tools/PCgen. License canceled with finished product <em>in the pipeline</em> that could never be released. Plus, there's no official replacement product even now, several months later. Now they pull the license on D/D mags and again there is no replacement product. </p><p></p><p>I understand the logic: if the competing products are dead long enough, the general public will be so eager to see something official that they'll hail the e-mag and online chargen as being "eagerly awaited." The problem is that they've shot their existing client base in the foot. The people who would use the electronic chargens were E-Tools/PCGen users and will still be somewhat disenchanted with WotC. The people who are willing to shell out cash for steady streams of content (e.g. subscribers to Dungeon/Dragon) will likely be quite irked at WotC as well, since they were cut off for several months. </p><p></p><p>It's hard to say how many of these people will use the digital initiative because it all comes down to how many move on to other games or are thoroughly disenchanted. WotC either expects these people will get over it and buy what they've got or that new users will replace them, indicating some kind of deep tie-in with 4e or DDM. </p><p></p><p>And they are probably right. The facelessness of a corporation means a house-cleaning and a new product launch can often reinvigorate the line. I know i was highly dissatisfied with TSR during the "Player's Options" years but I came to the WotC fold. </p><p></p><p>It does mean that I probably won't buy many product lines that are licensed from WotC though, since I know that if the product turns out to be successful enough or provide some other marketing tie-in that WotC is likely to cancel them and move them in-house with no support.</p><p></p><p>Sorry 3rd parties, unless you get a 10-year contract WHasbrotC is just too likely to screw you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kigmatzomat, post: 3471681, member: 9254"] Amusing, but futile. No significant number of gamers are going to boycott 4e for the simple fact that they will want to [i][b]see[/b][/i][b][/b] 4e before they make a judgement. I am personally expected to become a "d20" player (or whatever license-free name gets applied to R/SRD based games) after 4e comes out....but I'm still very likely to buy the 4e core books. This is/was a huge PR gaffe. The worst part is that WotC has shown this is a [i]consistent[/i] approach they take to handling the market. Look at E-Tools/PCgen. License canceled with finished product [i]in the pipeline[/i] that could never be released. Plus, there's no official replacement product even now, several months later. Now they pull the license on D/D mags and again there is no replacement product. I understand the logic: if the competing products are dead long enough, the general public will be so eager to see something official that they'll hail the e-mag and online chargen as being "eagerly awaited." The problem is that they've shot their existing client base in the foot. The people who would use the electronic chargens were E-Tools/PCGen users and will still be somewhat disenchanted with WotC. The people who are willing to shell out cash for steady streams of content (e.g. subscribers to Dungeon/Dragon) will likely be quite irked at WotC as well, since they were cut off for several months. It's hard to say how many of these people will use the digital initiative because it all comes down to how many move on to other games or are thoroughly disenchanted. WotC either expects these people will get over it and buy what they've got or that new users will replace them, indicating some kind of deep tie-in with 4e or DDM. And they are probably right. The facelessness of a corporation means a house-cleaning and a new product launch can often reinvigorate the line. I know i was highly dissatisfied with TSR during the "Player's Options" years but I came to the WotC fold. It does mean that I probably won't buy many product lines that are licensed from WotC though, since I know that if the product turns out to be successful enough or provide some other marketing tie-in that WotC is likely to cancel them and move them in-house with no support. Sorry 3rd parties, unless you get a 10-year contract WHasbrotC is just too likely to screw you. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
WotC Replies: Statements by WotC employees regarding Dragon/Dungeon going online
Top