Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[WOTC] Revised Corebooks for July confirmed with info
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="buzz" data-source="post: 527282" data-attributes="member: 6777"><p>It's obvious that we're not ging to agree here, so I'm not going to respond to everything you've said. If you've switched to GURPS, by all means, go and hang out on r.g.f.gurps and leave us to worry about the upcoming revisions.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The real one. Compiling errata when you're a company that puts out 200+ page rulebooks every month is something I imagine isn't the easiest task in the world. That WotC makes such an exceptional effort, even if SJG (and SJG alone) does a little better, is enough for me. If we were talking about any other company in the industry, you'd be lucky to get errata *at all*.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Then we're reading different FAQs. The SJG FAQ has 7 out of 11 sections that deal with rules questions, section 3 (Basic Set) being a whopper.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Then I guess you missed the big 4th ed. survey they did about a year ago. It was a big questionnaire asking people what kinds of revisions to all the "problem rules" they would like to see in a 4th edition. They still say "we're not doing a 4th edition," but they've been saying that for maybe a decade now. Go hang out on r.g.f.gurps and ask some people about it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Then this is a failing on your part. Read the Web site. Also, give them more than a week. More info is obviously forthcoming.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, what's logical to me is, if you're now a GURPS player, you would go and hang on GURPS forums, rather than posting on D&D forums about, in your incredibly informed opinion, all your complaints with WotC. Posting "why I decided to dump the system you guys are here to discuss" is one of the more lame things to do on the 'Net.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>See my comment about the survey above. Since you're new to GURPS, I'll let this ad hominem slide.</p><p></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Then you should have no problem with people who disagree with you. It's a given that people are posting opinions here. I'm posting mine, and in my opinion, while I think you are welcome to yours, I also think that you're being a little unrealistic, as well as indulging in a bit of GURPS newbie fanboy-ism.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Granted, I may be indulging in WotC-fanboy-ism, but at least I'm on the right fourm. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f644.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes :rolleyes:" data-smilie="11"data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /> </strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Thanks for the disucussion, and good gaming.</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="buzz, post: 527282, member: 6777"] It's obvious that we're not ging to agree here, so I'm not going to respond to everything you've said. If you've switched to GURPS, by all means, go and hang out on r.g.f.gurps and leave us to worry about the upcoming revisions. The real one. Compiling errata when you're a company that puts out 200+ page rulebooks every month is something I imagine isn't the easiest task in the world. That WotC makes such an exceptional effort, even if SJG (and SJG alone) does a little better, is enough for me. If we were talking about any other company in the industry, you'd be lucky to get errata *at all*. Then we're reading different FAQs. The SJG FAQ has 7 out of 11 sections that deal with rules questions, section 3 (Basic Set) being a whopper. Then I guess you missed the big 4th ed. survey they did about a year ago. It was a big questionnaire asking people what kinds of revisions to all the "problem rules" they would like to see in a 4th edition. They still say "we're not doing a 4th edition," but they've been saying that for maybe a decade now. Go hang out on r.g.f.gurps and ask some people about it. Then this is a failing on your part. Read the Web site. Also, give them more than a week. More info is obviously forthcoming. No, what's logical to me is, if you're now a GURPS player, you would go and hang on GURPS forums, rather than posting on D&D forums about, in your incredibly informed opinion, all your complaints with WotC. Posting "why I decided to dump the system you guys are here to discuss" is one of the more lame things to do on the 'Net. See my comment about the survey above. Since you're new to GURPS, I'll let this ad hominem slide. [B] Then you should have no problem with people who disagree with you. It's a given that people are posting opinions here. I'm posting mine, and in my opinion, while I think you are welcome to yours, I also think that you're being a little unrealistic, as well as indulging in a bit of GURPS newbie fanboy-ism. Granted, I may be indulging in WotC-fanboy-ism, but at least I'm on the right fourm. :rolleyes: Thanks for the disucussion, and good gaming.[/b] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[WOTC] Revised Corebooks for July confirmed with info
Top