Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DaveMage" data-source="post: 5770923" data-attributes="member: 10447">Oh, I know 3.0 came out in 2000.&nbsp; My point was that in 2002 we had 3.0, then the others.&nbsp; The debate whether essentials is a new edition notwithstanding, that's still a lot of edition turnover in a short period of time.&nbsp; I grew up on AD&amp;D (12 years) and 2E (11 years).&nbsp; I liked that pace.Will Pathfinder be like that pace?&nbsp; I can hope.&nbsp; If Paizo is true to their word that the rules exist to support their adventures, then there should be very little need to change the rules going forward.&nbsp; I'm very interested in what stories they can tell with adventures and monsters.&nbsp; Not as much interested in new rules - there are already enough options in Pathfinder rules-wise to game with for decades (at least at the pace that I play).(And, adding epic rules *ahem* would be the last thing that I need for a very long time.)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DaveMage, post: 5770923, member: 10447"] Oh, I know 3.0 came out in 2000. My point was that in 2002 we had 3.0, then the others. The debate whether essentials is a new edition notwithstanding, that's still a lot of edition turnover in a short period of time. I grew up on AD&D (12 years) and 2E (11 years). I liked that pace. Will Pathfinder be like that pace? I can hope. If Paizo is true to their word that the rules exist to support their adventures, then there should be very little need to change the rules going forward. I'm very interested in what stories they can tell with adventures and monsters. Not as much interested in new rules - there are already enough options in Pathfinder rules-wise to game with for decades (at least at the pace that I play). (And, adding epic rules *ahem* would be the last thing that I need for a very long time.) [/QUOTE]

Verification