Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
WotC Seeks Unity with a New Edition
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="talok55" data-source="post: 5776460" data-attributes="member: 6684559"><p>First of all, I'd have to disagree with you about the implied setting for 4E. It's too vague and too blah. It would have been much better to not destroy the Forgotten Realms and have it be the flagship campaign setting for 4E. I do not see how revamping and relaunching 4E would do them one bit of good. Besides the massive PR errors that WotC has made, the simple fact is that many people do not like the mechanics of 4E or the flavor of it's implied setting and the 4E Forgotten Realms. Anything that does not drastically alter both will not win back any fans that left. Many left because 4E is not D&D to them. They will not for one second consider buying a revamped 4E because it will still have everything they don't like about the game. For WotC to be successful with D&D, they have to bring back a lot of customers that bailed because of 4E. They absolutely cannot do that with a 4.75 (or whatever you call it). What they are doing now is even better than an apology to all the fans they angered with their horrendous 4E "marketing" and "ruining" their favorite game. They are not only saying "We messed up your game, and we're sorry." They are saying, "We are trying to fix our mistakes by making a game that is D&D to you." What else can they do that's better than that?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="talok55, post: 5776460, member: 6684559"] First of all, I'd have to disagree with you about the implied setting for 4E. It's too vague and too blah. It would have been much better to not destroy the Forgotten Realms and have it be the flagship campaign setting for 4E. I do not see how revamping and relaunching 4E would do them one bit of good. Besides the massive PR errors that WotC has made, the simple fact is that many people do not like the mechanics of 4E or the flavor of it's implied setting and the 4E Forgotten Realms. Anything that does not drastically alter both will not win back any fans that left. Many left because 4E is not D&D to them. They will not for one second consider buying a revamped 4E because it will still have everything they don't like about the game. For WotC to be successful with D&D, they have to bring back a lot of customers that bailed because of 4E. They absolutely cannot do that with a 4.75 (or whatever you call it). What they are doing now is even better than an apology to all the fans they angered with their horrendous 4E "marketing" and "ruining" their favorite game. They are not only saying "We messed up your game, and we're sorry." They are saying, "We are trying to fix our mistakes by making a game that is D&D to you." What else can they do that's better than that? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
WotC Seeks Unity with a New Edition
Top