Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Gargoyle" data-source="post: 1031684" data-attributes="member: 529">Yes, let's go back and refer to my original post that you replied to:WOTC told me at the seminar that the technological level is medieval.&nbsp; I'm repeating what they said.&nbsp; If you don't believe it, that is your prerogative.&nbsp; What I don't understand is why you can't imagine trains that are designed around magic, instead of steam power or other forms of technology?&nbsp; If your point is that you don't like magic functioning like technology does in the modern world, as a commodity that provides convenience, then I can understand that.&nbsp; But to say that they're lying...I don't know why they would...BTW, Bill Slaviscek refers to it as a &quot;magical conveyance&quot; rather than a train, and the handout refers to it as the &quot;lightning rail&quot; and not a train.&nbsp; Even if they had referred to it as a train that ran on magic, I don't think I'd object.edit: grammar/spelling</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Gargoyle, post: 1031684, member: 529"] Yes, let's go back and refer to my original post that you replied to: WOTC told me at the seminar that the technological level is medieval. I'm repeating what they said. If you don't believe it, that is your prerogative. What I don't understand is why you can't imagine trains that are designed around magic, instead of steam power or other forms of technology? If your point is that you don't like magic functioning like technology does in the modern world, as a commodity that provides convenience, then I can understand that. But to say that they're lying...I don't know why they would... BTW, Bill Slaviscek refers to it as a "magical conveyance" rather than a train, and the handout refers to it as the "lightning rail" and not a train. Even if they had referred to it as a train that ran on magic, I don't think I'd object. edit: grammar/spelling [/QUOTE]

Verification