Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
WotC setting search winner - Eberron
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="teitan" data-source="post: 1037130" data-attributes="member: 3457"><p>I just read the first four or five pages of the thread and to me it sounds like a vocal minority ranting and raving for one of two reasons...</p><p></p><p>1. Their setting submission was better, they thought it was a contest and are so mad that this guy broke some non-existent rule of this "contest" that they are going to have SOUR grapes and be angry even if this setting winds up outselling FR and DL combined and is the best thing since monkeys throwing pooh. Just to point out, NOWHERE did it say anything about technology levels in the guidelines we were requested to follow. Valterra said that WOTC wasn't looking for some higher technology world specifically and such a setting would have a difficult time breaking into the top 10.</p><p></p><p>2. They just want to see the older settings brought back except there is a problem with that... those older settings didn't sell as well as TSR, WOTC and now Hasbro would like. Remember that Hasbro changed the way FR books are done and almost removed the heart of the setting from it. Also, maybe WOTC has plans to bring back these older settings and just haven't revealed them yet. I don't remember the DLCS being announced until after this search was started, though I could be wrong. Honestly though, I don't think there is a lot of prophet to be had in relaunching these lines for HASBRO's bottom line. WOTC maybe, but HASBRO no. </p><p></p><p>I think some of the smaller companies should license these settings, let WOTC do the main book and publish it. Maybe WOTC could do one off books, who knows. But geesh, let it go...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Jason</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="teitan, post: 1037130, member: 3457"] I just read the first four or five pages of the thread and to me it sounds like a vocal minority ranting and raving for one of two reasons... 1. Their setting submission was better, they thought it was a contest and are so mad that this guy broke some non-existent rule of this "contest" that they are going to have SOUR grapes and be angry even if this setting winds up outselling FR and DL combined and is the best thing since monkeys throwing pooh. Just to point out, NOWHERE did it say anything about technology levels in the guidelines we were requested to follow. Valterra said that WOTC wasn't looking for some higher technology world specifically and such a setting would have a difficult time breaking into the top 10. 2. They just want to see the older settings brought back except there is a problem with that... those older settings didn't sell as well as TSR, WOTC and now Hasbro would like. Remember that Hasbro changed the way FR books are done and almost removed the heart of the setting from it. Also, maybe WOTC has plans to bring back these older settings and just haven't revealed them yet. I don't remember the DLCS being announced until after this search was started, though I could be wrong. Honestly though, I don't think there is a lot of prophet to be had in relaunching these lines for HASBRO's bottom line. WOTC maybe, but HASBRO no. I think some of the smaller companies should license these settings, let WOTC do the main book and publish it. Maybe WOTC could do one off books, who knows. But geesh, let it go... Jason [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
WotC setting search winner - Eberron
Top