Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WotC Should Make 5.5E Specific Setting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 9800866" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>Can they?</p><p></p><p>I am not trying to threadcrap here. I'm genuinely questioning whether it is <em>possible</em> to construct a setting that both has an identity of its own, and is also fully "the 5e setting". Because the whole point of 5e was to have as little individual identity as possible--to <em>not</em> be any specific thing, so that you would never snag on anything that would remind you it isn't YOUR specific thing. Obviously, it couldn't avoid having some elements that distinguish it, but they're pretty minimal, not really something I would consider the foundation of a setting.</p><p></p><p>5e's nature is "don't rock the boat". Can that make a setting?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Is that "a setting" though? That's like saying "Marvel, <em>all of Marvel</em>, every Elseworld, every alternate timeline, ALL of it" is "a setting". That has like seventeen different variations of every single character, mutually contradictory timelines (which have been <em>repeatedly</em> destroyed, recombined, recreated, redestroyed, re-recombined, re-recreated, re-redestroyed, etc., etc.)</p><p></p><p>Certainly, any <em>specific</em> world/timeline/universe of Marvel (or DC) would qualify as "a setting". But when you crack open the full-on out-and-out Multiverse, you inherently wash out all the elements that make something "a setting", at least in my view. Spelljammer avoids this because it isn't actually a multiverse--it's just a setup where instead of "star systems" you have "crystal spheres", going all Ptolemaic. There aren't infinitely many variations of Toril or Oerth all equally real and persistent. There's <em>a</em> crystal sphere for Toril, <em>a</em> sphere for Oerth, individual and inaccessible spheres for Athas and Eberron, etc.</p><p></p><p>When <em>literally everything</em> is true, you can say anything and always be correct, for at least some corner of the Multiverse. That doesn't look like a "setting" to me. It looks like a <em>container</em> that you can stuff settings into.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 9800866, member: 6790260"] Can they? I am not trying to threadcrap here. I'm genuinely questioning whether it is [I]possible[/I] to construct a setting that both has an identity of its own, and is also fully "the 5e setting". Because the whole point of 5e was to have as little individual identity as possible--to [I]not[/I] be any specific thing, so that you would never snag on anything that would remind you it isn't YOUR specific thing. Obviously, it couldn't avoid having some elements that distinguish it, but they're pretty minimal, not really something I would consider the foundation of a setting. 5e's nature is "don't rock the boat". Can that make a setting? Is that "a setting" though? That's like saying "Marvel, [I]all of Marvel[/I], every Elseworld, every alternate timeline, ALL of it" is "a setting". That has like seventeen different variations of every single character, mutually contradictory timelines (which have been [I]repeatedly[/I] destroyed, recombined, recreated, redestroyed, re-recombined, re-recreated, re-redestroyed, etc., etc.) Certainly, any [I]specific[/I] world/timeline/universe of Marvel (or DC) would qualify as "a setting". But when you crack open the full-on out-and-out Multiverse, you inherently wash out all the elements that make something "a setting", at least in my view. Spelljammer avoids this because it isn't actually a multiverse--it's just a setup where instead of "star systems" you have "crystal spheres", going all Ptolemaic. There aren't infinitely many variations of Toril or Oerth all equally real and persistent. There's [I]a[/I] crystal sphere for Toril, [I]a[/I] sphere for Oerth, individual and inaccessible spheres for Athas and Eberron, etc. When [I]literally everything[/I] is true, you can say anything and always be correct, for at least some corner of the Multiverse. That doesn't look like a "setting" to me. It looks like a [I]container[/I] that you can stuff settings into. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WotC Should Make 5.5E Specific Setting
Top