Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WotC Should Make 5.5E Specific Setting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Yaarel" data-source="post: 9803755" data-attributes="member: 58172"><p>It is remarkable: Tiefling and Dragonborn are newly prominent species of D&D. They rank in popularity alongside Dwarf. I suspect the Genasi-esque Goliath has already joined their ranks.</p><p></p><p>Thinking on the dynamics of D&D today, it differs from earlier decades.</p><p></p><p>D&D continues to remain Human-and-Elf-centric. With the "Half-Elf" merging into the (sometimes charismatic) Elf, I suspect the popularity of the Elf has surpassed the Human.</p><p></p><p>The Tolkienism of Halfling and Orc still has some currency but is fading into obscurity. I am unsure World of Warcraft is keeping the Orc afloat. The 2024 Orc lacs a distinctive identity. It seems to default into some kind of half-human half ogre. We will see how it develops. (Personally, I like the etymological ogre-orc-orcus association. Playing up both Giant and Shadowfell themes works for Orc.)</p><p></p><p>The 1e Gnome originated during the early class restrictions as a kind of Dwarf who could be a Magic-User. Even so, reallife folkbeliefs about house sprites keep the Gnome concept buoyant. Yet generally, the Small folk are loosing popularity. Dwarf recategorized to Medium size, while Halfling and Gnome are in decline.</p><p></p><p>The Awsimar ranks along with but after Halfling, Orc, and Gnome. The UA attempt to merge Awsimar with humanimals Aarakocra and Tabaxi didnt take. As far as I can tell, the popularity of Awsimar is stable, but last of the Players Handbook species. We will see if it gains from being core now.</p><p></p><p>Regarding a setting for the 2024 Awsimar, Tiefling, and Dragonborn:</p><p></p><p>Any Humanoid species can produce an individual who is a Tiefling or an Awsimar. These "astrals"(Fiend or Celestial respectively) lack their own native culture. Their culture is whichever they are born into. The 4e Nentir setting developed the Tiefling with their own ancient human culture. But 5e 2024 focuses on the individuals. I feel this is enough of an origin to make sense in any setting that has an Astral Plane.</p><p></p><p>The Dragonborn originate magically from Dragons who shapeshift their own unhatched Dragons into Humanoids. The Dragonborn can appear in any setting that has Dragons. </p><p></p><p>These Dragonborn can reproduce. My impression is, these draconic Humanoids got together despite the conflicts among their ancestral Dragons. Thus historically they formed a kind of Pan-Dragon culture that blends the cultural influences from both metallic and chromatic Dragons. Now, if Dragons hatch a new Dragonborn, the newborns grow up in the culture of the Dragon parents, not the Pan-Dragon Dragonborn culture. This Pan-Dragon culture also includes nondragonborn species that immigrated in. Despite the mixed metallic-chromatic ancestry of most Dragonborn, each individual seems to select the traits from only one of their ancestors.</p><p></p><p>Inferably, Gem Dragonborn exist, but remained with their Gem Dragon parents, and never joined the Pan-Dragon culture. </p><p></p><p>According to the Players Handbook, the origins of Awsimar, Tiefling, and Dragonborn are terse and versatile. It is easy to reuse the data for almost any setting. Even so, there seems enough data for a setting as-is, with minimal elaboration.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Yaarel, post: 9803755, member: 58172"] It is remarkable: Tiefling and Dragonborn are newly prominent species of D&D. They rank in popularity alongside Dwarf. I suspect the Genasi-esque Goliath has already joined their ranks. Thinking on the dynamics of D&D today, it differs from earlier decades. D&D continues to remain Human-and-Elf-centric. With the "Half-Elf" merging into the (sometimes charismatic) Elf, I suspect the popularity of the Elf has surpassed the Human. The Tolkienism of Halfling and Orc still has some currency but is fading into obscurity. I am unsure World of Warcraft is keeping the Orc afloat. The 2024 Orc lacs a distinctive identity. It seems to default into some kind of half-human half ogre. We will see how it develops. (Personally, I like the etymological ogre-orc-orcus association. Playing up both Giant and Shadowfell themes works for Orc.) The 1e Gnome originated during the early class restrictions as a kind of Dwarf who could be a Magic-User. Even so, reallife folkbeliefs about house sprites keep the Gnome concept buoyant. Yet generally, the Small folk are loosing popularity. Dwarf recategorized to Medium size, while Halfling and Gnome are in decline. The Awsimar ranks along with but after Halfling, Orc, and Gnome. The UA attempt to merge Awsimar with humanimals Aarakocra and Tabaxi didnt take. As far as I can tell, the popularity of Awsimar is stable, but last of the Players Handbook species. We will see if it gains from being core now. Regarding a setting for the 2024 Awsimar, Tiefling, and Dragonborn: Any Humanoid species can produce an individual who is a Tiefling or an Awsimar. These "astrals"(Fiend or Celestial respectively) lack their own native culture. Their culture is whichever they are born into. The 4e Nentir setting developed the Tiefling with their own ancient human culture. But 5e 2024 focuses on the individuals. I feel this is enough of an origin to make sense in any setting that has an Astral Plane. The Dragonborn originate magically from Dragons who shapeshift their own unhatched Dragons into Humanoids. The Dragonborn can appear in any setting that has Dragons. These Dragonborn can reproduce. My impression is, these draconic Humanoids got together despite the conflicts among their ancestral Dragons. Thus historically they formed a kind of Pan-Dragon culture that blends the cultural influences from both metallic and chromatic Dragons. Now, if Dragons hatch a new Dragonborn, the newborns grow up in the culture of the Dragon parents, not the Pan-Dragon Dragonborn culture. This Pan-Dragon culture also includes nondragonborn species that immigrated in. Despite the mixed metallic-chromatic ancestry of most Dragonborn, each individual seems to select the traits from only one of their ancestors. Inferably, Gem Dragonborn exist, but remained with their Gem Dragon parents, and never joined the Pan-Dragon culture. According to the Players Handbook, the origins of Awsimar, Tiefling, and Dragonborn are terse and versatile. It is easy to reuse the data for almost any setting. Even so, there seems enough data for a setting as-is, with minimal elaboration. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WotC Should Make 5.5E Specific Setting
Top