Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="rjdafoe" data-source="post: 5206800" data-attributes="member: 54591">So what your saying is that after the fact, it could NOT be the wrong decision to remove them?I could say the same thing for you about prove it.  My proof exists on the internet, in a time line if you care to look as to what happened.  All we can do is make a conclusion as to that time line as to what is likely that happened.  Your the one claiming they didn't make any money.You can't get any more explicit than this:<a href="http://www.icv2.com/articles/news/14693.html" target="_blank">ICv2 - WotC Ends PDF Download Sales</a><a href="http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19704938/WotC_halts_salesdownloads_from_rpgnow.com&post_num=85#335393634" target="_blank">Whoops! Browser Settings Incompatible</a>The fact is, you do not know that they were not making money and they pulled the PDFs at the time of the lawsuits.  Period.  Straight from WotC.If what "some participants" says are true in the first link (they are as true as you guys are) - then I don't buy your not making money argument.The other thing that makes digital books good for customers (but I will say maybe not good for businesses) is that errata can be incorporated into them and they can be re-downloaded with updated fixes.</blockquote>