Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="FadedC" data-source="post: 4010472" data-attributes="member: 55463">Well first off your assuming that cloaks of invisibility will exist. Given that cloak is a &quot;required slot&quot; that gives static bonuses and invisibility is a trick effect, I suspect that cloak of invisibility will not in fact exist in the first place and will be replaced by an item that fills a minor slot.In fact the 3 primary slots do seem to be divided by effect. The weapon slot imrpoves your abilities, the armor slot protects you and the cloak slot presumably improves your magic resistance or something like that. It's the minor slots that are not as divided by type simply because they are......minor.If your asking if somebody couldn't just subsitute a +3 wand that improves their casting ability with a +3 torc that improves their casting ability, that's not an unreasonable houserule, though it becomes harder to justify why you can't just use both.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="FadedC, post: 4010472, member: 55463"] Well first off your assuming that cloaks of invisibility will exist. Given that cloak is a "required slot" that gives static bonuses and invisibility is a trick effect, I suspect that cloak of invisibility will not in fact exist in the first place and will be replaced by an item that fills a minor slot. In fact the 3 primary slots do seem to be divided by effect. The weapon slot imrpoves your abilities, the armor slot protects you and the cloak slot presumably improves your magic resistance or something like that. It's the minor slots that are not as divided by type simply because they are......minor. If your asking if somebody couldn't just subsitute a +3 wand that improves their casting ability with a +3 torc that improves their casting ability, that's not an unreasonable houserule, though it becomes harder to justify why you can't just use both. [/QUOTE]

Verification