Steel_Wind
Legend
This topic has been discussed on Board Game Geek and on the Wizkids message boards yesterday and today, but has not as yet been the subject of comment on ENWorld.
While not directly RPG related, it certainly is game and industry related and should be of interest to ENWorlders, generally.
The substance of WotC's press release is as follows:
The patent itself is available for viewing here: http://v3.espacenet.com/textclam?DB=EPODOC&IDX=US2004084842&F=0&QPN=US2004084842
What this all means and the prior art that existed before the patent, (which is one of the things that determines if an idea / process is sufficiently novel to be patentable) is a matter which has yet to be clarified. The USPTO deems it worthy for a patent - but the US PTO relies principally upon other interested parties with a financial stake to challenge patents and litigate the matter before the courts. That is the inherent nature of the patent system.
Clearly, the party whose interests are jeopardized is Topps and its subsidiary Wizkids, who have had some success with the Pirates of the Spanish Main Constructible strategy game. Just as importantly, Wizkids was slated to release a new CSG, the Star Wars Pocket Model CSG next month in June - at more or less the same time as WotC is due to roll out the Transformers CSG by the end of next week.
Given that the Star Wars Pocket Model game competes not only with an existing Star Wars ship miniatures game from WotC, but will also compete against the Transfromers CSG, the odds of a steaming bowl of IP litigation being served by reason of all of this seems more likely than not.
I actually buy and play the Pirates of the Spanish Main CSG with my son and have enjoyed modding the rules and otherwise using these naval miniatures in other games - so this is more than a little aggravating to me.
I have some difficulty accepting that a CSG has been originated by WotC, given the fact the history of games from Steve Jackson, (Pirate Lego Wars) the homebrew Lego Wars from the early 90s - and even back even to Rock Em Sock Em robots, suggests that this does not appear to be all that original a concept.
I'll go further and say that the claimed computer applications of this patent are a pile of hooey and the prior art is so large that the extension of the patent to that area seems a big stretch.
As in most things, the only opinion that matters is ultimately that of the Circuit Court of Appeals'.
We'll see.
While not directly RPG related, it certainly is game and industry related and should be of interest to ENWorlders, generally.
The substance of WotC's press release is as follows:
Wizards of the Coast Awarded Patent for Constructible Strategy Game
May 22, 2007 (Renton, Wash.) – Wizards of the Coast, the world leader in hobby gaming, and a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc. (NYSE: HAS), today announced that the United States Patent and Trademark Office has awarded it a patent U.S. Patent No. 7,201,374, on game play design for constructible strategy games.
Wizards pioneered the constructible strategy game category five years ago. The invention, code named “Punch Bots,” combined Wizards’ original repeat-purchase business model and the excitement of trading card game combat to create strategically assembled – and disassembled – models. Wizards first filed for patent protection in October of 2002. The full text and images of the patent are available at www.uspto.gov
“The hard work of our staff was of course central to our success in securing this patent and we couldn’t be more pleased,” said Loren Greenwood, President of Wizards of the Coast. “We’re excited to bring to market new games that will broaden the reach of this category in our industry.”
The first offering by Wizards in this category is next month’s much-anticipated TRANSFORMERS™ 3D battle-card game, which releases on June 2.
The patent itself is available for viewing here: http://v3.espacenet.com/textclam?DB=EPODOC&IDX=US2004084842&F=0&QPN=US2004084842
What this all means and the prior art that existed before the patent, (which is one of the things that determines if an idea / process is sufficiently novel to be patentable) is a matter which has yet to be clarified. The USPTO deems it worthy for a patent - but the US PTO relies principally upon other interested parties with a financial stake to challenge patents and litigate the matter before the courts. That is the inherent nature of the patent system.
Clearly, the party whose interests are jeopardized is Topps and its subsidiary Wizkids, who have had some success with the Pirates of the Spanish Main Constructible strategy game. Just as importantly, Wizkids was slated to release a new CSG, the Star Wars Pocket Model CSG next month in June - at more or less the same time as WotC is due to roll out the Transformers CSG by the end of next week.
Given that the Star Wars Pocket Model game competes not only with an existing Star Wars ship miniatures game from WotC, but will also compete against the Transfromers CSG, the odds of a steaming bowl of IP litigation being served by reason of all of this seems more likely than not.
I actually buy and play the Pirates of the Spanish Main CSG with my son and have enjoyed modding the rules and otherwise using these naval miniatures in other games - so this is more than a little aggravating to me.
I have some difficulty accepting that a CSG has been originated by WotC, given the fact the history of games from Steve Jackson, (Pirate Lego Wars) the homebrew Lego Wars from the early 90s - and even back even to Rock Em Sock Em robots, suggests that this does not appear to be all that original a concept.
I'll go further and say that the claimed computer applications of this patent are a pile of hooey and the prior art is so large that the extension of the patent to that area seems a big stretch.
As in most things, the only opinion that matters is ultimately that of the Circuit Court of Appeals'.
We'll see.
Last edited: