Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WotC Survey about PHB spells!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ibrandul" data-source="post: 8470593" data-attributes="member: 6871736"><p>I thoughtfully answered the first few pages of spells, diligently looking up any spells I was rusty on, then realized I just didn't want to do this anymore.</p><p></p><p>So I just clicked "next" a lot without rating anything, to see what was coming up. It asked me to rate twenty pages' worth of spells! And then it asked "Would you like to rate any more spells?" to which the answer was clearly NO. Who knows how much longer the survey would have lasted if I'd clicked "Yes."</p><p></p><p>Unless you have an encyclopedic knowledge of 5e PHB spells, one of the following will happen to you if you take this survey: 1) you'll click "Don't know" a whole lot; 2) you'll provide ratings, but most of your answers won't be meaningful because you won't have ready-to-mind opinions about the spells you're rating; 3) you'll bail, like I did; or 4) you will spend a very long time looking up the spells you're less familiar with.</p><p></p><p>The spells were also ordered aphabetically, starting with "A." Was this the case for everyone? From a survey design perspective, it seems trivially obvious to point out that the pages ought to have some randomness to them—say, starting people out at different letters of the alphabet—or your answers are going to be very skewed (most people will give more thought to page 1 than to page 10, and they're likely to rate page 10 spells lower, too).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ibrandul, post: 8470593, member: 6871736"] I thoughtfully answered the first few pages of spells, diligently looking up any spells I was rusty on, then realized I just didn't want to do this anymore. So I just clicked "next" a lot without rating anything, to see what was coming up. It asked me to rate twenty pages' worth of spells! And then it asked "Would you like to rate any more spells?" to which the answer was clearly NO. Who knows how much longer the survey would have lasted if I'd clicked "Yes." Unless you have an encyclopedic knowledge of 5e PHB spells, one of the following will happen to you if you take this survey: 1) you'll click "Don't know" a whole lot; 2) you'll provide ratings, but most of your answers won't be meaningful because you won't have ready-to-mind opinions about the spells you're rating; 3) you'll bail, like I did; or 4) you will spend a very long time looking up the spells you're less familiar with. The spells were also ordered aphabetically, starting with "A." Was this the case for everyone? From a survey design perspective, it seems trivially obvious to point out that the pages ought to have some randomness to them—say, starting people out at different letters of the alphabet—or your answers are going to be very skewed (most people will give more thought to page 1 than to page 10, and they're likely to rate page 10 spells lower, too). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WotC Survey about PHB spells!
Top