Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WotC Survey about PHB spells!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="squibbles" data-source="post: 8473942" data-attributes="member: 6937590"><p>I do!</p><p></p><p>I have now taken the survey 8 times and catalogued every spell I was asked about. (I didn't answer any questions except #1 on surveys 2-8 because I wanted to avoid biasing their... convenience sample)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The survey asks about every spell in the PHB, all 361 of them.</p><p></p><p>Each survey taker, though, "<em>only</em>" rates 180 spells in randomly selected alphabetical blocks of 10 (or 181 if your survey includes the 11 spell block with zone of truth).</p><p></p><p>...Which makes me sad. I thought I would discover the underlying secrets of the universe via this exercise. But, unfortunately, WotC isn't doing anything particularly clever. It's just a brute force Likert scale of everything, which they--incorrectly it seems--thought they could get a better response rate on by only giving respondents <em>half </em>of the PHB spells to rate.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Since what WotC seems to want is the general community feeling about every spell, I don't think there's a significantly better way for them to construct their questions. They don't actually care <em>why </em>any individual dislikes this or that spell; the D&D community is inevitably fractious and disagreeable about all questions posed to it (nevermind that things like fireball are <em>deliberately</em> overtuned--because overpowered things can be fun). WotC are just trying to identify what spells they need to take action on. From their point of view, a 1-6 yea/nay is the most helpful thing we can give them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="squibbles, post: 8473942, member: 6937590"] I do! I have now taken the survey 8 times and catalogued every spell I was asked about. (I didn't answer any questions except #1 on surveys 2-8 because I wanted to avoid biasing their... convenience sample) The survey asks about every spell in the PHB, all 361 of them. Each survey taker, though, "[I]only[/I]" rates 180 spells in randomly selected alphabetical blocks of 10 (or 181 if your survey includes the 11 spell block with zone of truth). ...Which makes me sad. I thought I would discover the underlying secrets of the universe via this exercise. But, unfortunately, WotC isn't doing anything particularly clever. It's just a brute force Likert scale of everything, which they--incorrectly it seems--thought they could get a better response rate on by only giving respondents [I]half [/I]of the PHB spells to rate. Since what WotC seems to want is the general community feeling about every spell, I don't think there's a significantly better way for them to construct their questions. They don't actually care [I]why [/I]any individual dislikes this or that spell; the D&D community is inevitably fractious and disagreeable about all questions posed to it (nevermind that things like fireball are [I]deliberately[/I] overtuned--because overpowered things can be fun). WotC are just trying to identify what spells they need to take action on. From their point of view, a 1-6 yea/nay is the most helpful thing we can give them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WotC Survey about PHB spells!
Top