Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="spinozajack" data-source="post: 7669509" data-attributes="member: 6794198">Well I hope so. I don't like chopping down extra trees for stuff like worthless character class options. They need to patch the books we already own, not sell us new ones or tell us to use this other (hopefully less underpowered / unbalanced) variant instead. But I'm not optimistic there, they've told us several times that their plan for fixing lackluster options is to go the path of option bloat by superceding PHB choices with AU article choices.I really hope that's not the case in the end. Some real crunch changes need to be made for the PHB errata document, not minor cosmetic phrasing clarifications.I've brought dozens of people into D&D in the past year, and bought two sets of books. I take my hobby seriously, and so should Wotc. A tepid errata document is not going to cut it if they expect future legal purchases from me. I expect aftermarket support and maintenance / service packs, not vague promises or untested web publications.If they make a BeastMaster 2.0 and publish that, instead of patching BeastMaster 1.0, I'm probably going to vow that from now on, that kind of attitude will not be financed by my dineros or support or advocacy.</blockquote>