Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WotC Survey Result: Classes OK, Eberron Needs Work
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 7669512" data-attributes="member: 12731"><p>Prepare to be disappointed. </p><p></p><p>WotC has clearly said errata will be reserved for obvious stuff. </p><p></p><p>If there's ever a Beastmaster 2.0 it will come as a new sub-class rather than official errata to the existing one. </p><p></p><p>And you know what? That's perfectly fine for me. </p><p></p><p>The important part is getting there, not how you got there.</p><p></p><p>I want an official option for a ranger with a independent combat pet. I want more sorcerer builds. (That's the big two. More cleric domains and so on are also welcome, but not nearly as needed for my table)</p><p></p><p>But whether I get that because the current stuff is errataed, or simply because new options become available; not so important. </p><p></p><p>In fact, I can sympathize to a certain degree with the peeps that dislike having to remember that parts of their existing books have been erased/replaced.</p><p></p><p>But mainly, I recognize how WotC needs to sell more books. </p><p></p><p>And here, frankly, I realize that the approach of past editions, errata followed by surreptious power creep, doesn't work. </p><p></p><p>Much better then to clearly state "here's a better ranger, please spend money on him. But there's nothing particularly <em>wrong</em> with the existing one. Sure, he wasn't as popular as we hoped but he still <em>works</em>, so, somewhat like basic rules, if you don't need better rangers, keep your money and use the PHB one"</p><p></p><p>Hope that helps blunt your disappoint <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 7669512, member: 12731"] Prepare to be disappointed. WotC has clearly said errata will be reserved for obvious stuff. If there's ever a Beastmaster 2.0 it will come as a new sub-class rather than official errata to the existing one. And you know what? That's perfectly fine for me. The important part is getting there, not how you got there. I want an official option for a ranger with a independent combat pet. I want more sorcerer builds. (That's the big two. More cleric domains and so on are also welcome, but not nearly as needed for my table) But whether I get that because the current stuff is errataed, or simply because new options become available; not so important. In fact, I can sympathize to a certain degree with the peeps that dislike having to remember that parts of their existing books have been erased/replaced. But mainly, I recognize how WotC needs to sell more books. And here, frankly, I realize that the approach of past editions, errata followed by surreptious power creep, doesn't work. Much better then to clearly state "here's a better ranger, please spend money on him. But there's nothing particularly [I]wrong[/I] with the existing one. Sure, he wasn't as popular as we hoped but he still [I]works[/I], so, somewhat like basic rules, if you don't need better rangers, keep your money and use the PHB one" Hope that helps blunt your disappoint :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WotC Survey Result: Classes OK, Eberron Needs Work
Top