Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
WotC Talks OGL... Again! Draft Coming Jan 20th With Feedback Survey; v1 De-Auth Still On
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ilgatto" data-source="post: 8906584" data-attributes="member: 86051"><p>While I do think that you're right that certain high-ups currently at WotC probably won't give a fig about losing some subscriptions, that doesn't necessarily mean that they can do whatever the <s>hell</s> lamp they want and that they won't try to limit the damage done to their "brand" on some level.</p><p></p><p></p><p>If you are referring to their recent statement, this may, indeed, give the impression that they "are willing to listen". However, so far, it appears that they are only going to do so in the form of a questionnaire, of which we know nothing. Much will depend on the questions in this questionnaire, their wording, what WotC is going to do with the information they get, and how they are going to react to it.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I think that this "No" is for a large part the result of WotC still having said absolutely nothing about the possibility of allowing future 3PP publications to operate under the OGL 1.0/1.0a, which is a major - if not actually the main - concern for many of these 3PPs. </p><p>And however people express themselves here - in anger, frustration, with reason, sarcasm, cynicism, or a sense of humor - I do believe that the gut-feeling many have that WotC is not going to back down where their statements on the OGL 1.0/1.0a so far are concerned, is correct.</p><p></p><p></p><p>That remains to be seen. As far I have come to understand it, it would seem that there is a good case to be made against WotC killing the OGL 1.0/1.0a unilaterally, also in light of what seems to have been their intent (under different rule) at the time the original OGL was issued. </p><p>As to the argument that 3PPs are going to lose that fight because money, I would hope that this will not affect a judge. Where you're right is that money can buy lawyers perhaps not very interested in the moral aspect of the case but in winning it at all costs. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>For now, I guess we'll have to wait for the questionnaire and see whether that allows for any kind of "talking to them".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ilgatto, post: 8906584, member: 86051"] While I do think that you're right that certain high-ups currently at WotC probably won't give a fig about losing some subscriptions, that doesn't necessarily mean that they can do whatever the [S]hell[/S] lamp they want and that they won't try to limit the damage done to their "brand" on some level. If you are referring to their recent statement, this may, indeed, give the impression that they "are willing to listen". However, so far, it appears that they are only going to do so in the form of a questionnaire, of which we know nothing. Much will depend on the questions in this questionnaire, their wording, what WotC is going to do with the information they get, and how they are going to react to it. I think that this "No" is for a large part the result of WotC still having said absolutely nothing about the possibility of allowing future 3PP publications to operate under the OGL 1.0/1.0a, which is a major - if not actually the main - concern for many of these 3PPs. And however people express themselves here - in anger, frustration, with reason, sarcasm, cynicism, or a sense of humor - I do believe that the gut-feeling many have that WotC is not going to back down where their statements on the OGL 1.0/1.0a so far are concerned, is correct. That remains to be seen. As far I have come to understand it, it would seem that there is a good case to be made against WotC killing the OGL 1.0/1.0a unilaterally, also in light of what seems to have been their intent (under different rule) at the time the original OGL was issued. As to the argument that 3PPs are going to lose that fight because money, I would hope that this will not affect a judge. Where you're right is that money can buy lawyers perhaps not very interested in the moral aspect of the case but in winning it at all costs. For now, I guess we'll have to wait for the questionnaire and see whether that allows for any kind of "talking to them". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
WotC Talks OGL... Again! Draft Coming Jan 20th With Feedback Survey; v1 De-Auth Still On
Top