Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
WotC To Give Core D&D Mechanics To Community Via Creative Commons
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sigfried" data-source="post: 8911881" data-attributes="member: 1798"><p>I'm not to concerned about their intent. I know others are, but a corporation just doesn't have any kind of character, good or bad, it's like "True Neutral," whatever makes the most money or they think makes the most money is what they do. Here, they are balancing commercial competition with goodwill.</p><p></p><p>I don't see how they can give more than the OGL 1.0 offers regarding compatibility and content. The only improvement is the branding badge, which has some value. The 1.2 offer gives WOTC significantly more control than 1.0 and offers the same text.</p><p></p><p>They could just leave the 1.0 OGL in place and make a license with a morality clause in return for using the compatibility logo. That would be perfectly reasonable, and its what they did with the d20 logo back in the day during the 3e era.</p><p></p><p>I'm not sure if you are a publisher or not. If you think the 1.2 terms are good, then by all means, sign up. I'm not going to hold it against anyone who wants to do business with WOTC, that's a personal decision and it's not a question of morality or ethics in my view at least.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sigfried, post: 8911881, member: 1798"] I'm not to concerned about their intent. I know others are, but a corporation just doesn't have any kind of character, good or bad, it's like "True Neutral," whatever makes the most money or they think makes the most money is what they do. Here, they are balancing commercial competition with goodwill. I don't see how they can give more than the OGL 1.0 offers regarding compatibility and content. The only improvement is the branding badge, which has some value. The 1.2 offer gives WOTC significantly more control than 1.0 and offers the same text. They could just leave the 1.0 OGL in place and make a license with a morality clause in return for using the compatibility logo. That would be perfectly reasonable, and its what they did with the d20 logo back in the day during the 3e era. I'm not sure if you are a publisher or not. If you think the 1.2 terms are good, then by all means, sign up. I'm not going to hold it against anyone who wants to do business with WOTC, that's a personal decision and it's not a question of morality or ethics in my view at least. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
WotC To Give Core D&D Mechanics To Community Via Creative Commons
Top