Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Enrahim2" data-source="post: 8907068" data-attributes="member: 7039850">I think this is close.<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Clarify that it is only the offer of direct use of wizard's SRDs under 1.0a that is "no longer authorized" - so no effect on use of third party open gaming content for new projects (including content that might be interpreted as modifications of SRD content).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Remove the clause about waiving right to contest hateful definition.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Put that section into the 30 day notice bucket.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Remove the waiver of class action clause</li> </ul>With these changes it seem like a contract that does what likely is most important to them, while I guess possibly being competitive enough that some quality creators might consider it (if they can forgive wizards for what they tried to do).The VTT policy is an obvious trap though, as there is absolutely nothing that indicate that that policy can't be changed at will, once the VTT segment can no longer rely on the combined effort of the entire community to protect them via the 1.0a outrage.</blockquote>