Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Myrdin Potter" data-source="post: 8907436" data-attributes="member: 6843593">Oh look, first they trying to fight against the bad non-inclusiveness people. Bad bad. See, they fixed their own issue but they have the hammer to completely destroy others when they just fixed it in new printings but they can terminate the license which make those other guys, not the Slave Space Monkeys guys subject to worse than the goody goody guys who recently wrote about Slave Space Monkeys. And, wink wink, nod nod, that older stuff, just slap a disclaimer on it and keep selling it but ban hammer those other bad non-inclusive guys.And lets toss in NuTSR who is NOT USING THE OGL and whose questionable actions are about trademarks and direct IP/copyright violations as the example to show how bad bad those other guys are which means they need to have this new shiny license that they are proposing in draft form. Not the other non-draft and worse form that was just presented, nope here is a real draft.I remain unconvinced by your argument.</blockquote>