Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Matt Thomason" data-source="post: 8907833" data-attributes="member: 6777331">That's technically true with the OGL too, if someone decides not to contribute anything as Open Game Content.  The main difference here is that you will need to specify what license you are contributing your content under, the 1.2 license has no Section15-alike mechanism to add your contributions into the existing license page, but does specify you are free to license your own content however you wish.  I do feel it's stupid and messy, though, not to give us the option to simply add our own content to a S15-alike clause on the 1.2 license page.This is worrying, yes.  Now, there's an argument that something like a character creator is just a partly-written VTT, its the bit of the tabletop directly in front of each player rather than the shared map areas, and similar arguments for other bits of software.  I feel they're likely not going to have any problems with people making those.  They do need to clarify it, though, and there needs to be wording to ensure they cannot change their minds later if something comes out they feels threatens their own products but didn't think of banning at the time.On that last issue alone, I'm adamant that we must see a court judgement on the continued use of 1.0a.</blockquote>