Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="doctorbadwolf" data-source="post: 8908181" data-attributes="member: 6704184">Yeah I think they’re gonna have a hard time with that. Owlbear, I can kinda see. D&Ds owlbear is distinctly D&D. I saw people talk about how the Druid turning into an owlbear made the D&D movie trailer feel like a D&D movie, for them, along with the gelatinous cube and displacer beast. This is a bad take. The OGL was literally written to be perpetual and irrevocable. That was the unambiguous intent of the license. It is completely reasonable to expect that status to hold…in perpetuity, and it is even more reasonable to be upset at the idea of having to jump through new hoops in order to publish new material related to works you’ve been publishing for years and that are the basis of your entire company. I think the badge is even optional. Yeah, probably. I think that what is critical for them here is that such a product is easily repudiated by them, and it’s less risky for a publishers to just use the new OGL or just the CC mechanics. Such a product is, if wotc is able to get hay they want here, unlicensed in the context of D&D. It’s off-brand, bootleg, etc, because it isn’t under the currently approved wotc D&D license. Which isn’t great, and I think they’re foolish to think they need this, but I also don’t think is an especially bad situation, as long as the new OGL is reasonable. It’s a sign of good faith, that ensures in a truly ironclad way, that they can’t “OGL 1.1” us ever again, at least as far as basic compatibility with D&D 5e goes. The new OGL allows even more, obviously. But the CC isn’t under their control. They can’t even vaguely wave a hand toward the idea of being able to revoke it. Ever. They can’t even go after offensive games or whatever, and anyone who hates wotc now but has content they’ve invested into that used D&D as a base, can make new content that is compatible with that work, as long as that new work doesn’t feature things that aren’t in the CC, all without even touching the OGL. If I want to make a spellbook for Level Up, and I hate wotc, all I have to do is just make sure that my spells aren’t D&D spells, and don’t reference things that wotc thinks belong to them. Because the mechanical kernel is compatible, the only rules text I might need to reference is CC, and Level Up itself is covered under the OGL 1.0a. I don’t have to be using the same license as level up, to make something that is a combination of CC content and my own new creative work. Like the OGL has always been, it’s an open hand inviting everyone (except Nazis) into the big tent. It’s a way of saying, “even if this company becomes an evil fascist wart, it simply cannot ever even try to argue that it could hypothetically mess with your creative works made using this work. In total, the proposal means you can just copy-paste the exact wording, and huge swaths of games that do so will be built upon a lingua Franca that means that no one has to learn a new entire system to go from one game to another, preserving and strengthening the concept of the OGL, but with that “offensive content” caveat.</blockquote>

Verification