Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
WotC Unveils Draft of New Open Gaming License
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Matt Thomason" data-source="post: 8908761" data-attributes="member: 6777331"><p>I don't think it's fair either. I'm just saying currently I would absolutely <em>not</em> agree to 1.2 without more major changes, and would rather use ORC than that if it comes down to it and walk away from WotC altogether rather than hand them more control on a plate. </p><p></p><p>My first preference is still that 1.0a remains usable as-is, and use it for some stuff and ORC for others, with an eye to getting more ORC things done so I'm not as dependent on things involving the OGL and WotC - I do not want all my eggs in one basket after recent events, and it was likely a big mistake of mine to do that in the first place, so I'm correcting my mistake here.</p><p></p><p>My second is that 1.2 loses all the clauses giving WotC unilateral control over various things, adding restrictions to software not present in 1.0a, and makes it clear how to use 1.0a-licensed 3PP content with it, and I use that in one hand and ORC in the other.</p><p></p><p>My third, if they make it completely impossible for me to do what I want to do under any license, is to go 100% ORC (with anything thats solely my own work, for contracted work I'm still pretty much tied to 1.0a/1.2 for the forseeable future in some way no matter what happens.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Matt Thomason, post: 8908761, member: 6777331"] I don't think it's fair either. I'm just saying currently I would absolutely [I]not[/I] agree to 1.2 without more major changes, and would rather use ORC than that if it comes down to it and walk away from WotC altogether rather than hand them more control on a plate. My first preference is still that 1.0a remains usable as-is, and use it for some stuff and ORC for others, with an eye to getting more ORC things done so I'm not as dependent on things involving the OGL and WotC - I do not want all my eggs in one basket after recent events, and it was likely a big mistake of mine to do that in the first place, so I'm correcting my mistake here. My second is that 1.2 loses all the clauses giving WotC unilateral control over various things, adding restrictions to software not present in 1.0a, and makes it clear how to use 1.0a-licensed 3PP content with it, and I use that in one hand and ORC in the other. My third, if they make it completely impossible for me to do what I want to do under any license, is to go 100% ORC (with anything thats solely my own work, for contracted work I'm still pretty much tied to 1.0a/1.2 for the forseeable future in some way no matter what happens.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
WotC Unveils Draft of New Open Gaming License
Top