Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
WotC Walks Back Some OGL Changes, But Not All
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mamba" data-source="post: 8894652" data-attributes="member: 7034611"><p>Quite a bit of backpedalling and revised history there</p><p></p><p>"<em>When we initially conceived of revising the OGL, it was with three major goals in mind. First, we wanted the ability to prevent the use of D&D content from being included in hateful and discriminatory products. Second, we wanted to address those attempting to use D&D in web3, blockchain games, and NFTs</em>"</p><p></p><p>you could have accomplished that much simpler, you explicitly said print and PDF only, not even VTTs, the above list does not match that.</p><p></p><p>"<em>And third, we wanted to ensure that the OGL is for the content creator, the homebrewer, the aspiring designer, our players, and the community—not major corporations to use for their own commercial and promotional purpose.</em>"</p><p></p><p>Define 'major', I am not seeing any major corporatrions here, and if a company manages to make 5-10M in D&D adjacent products, they do sell them to 'the community'. And that range is already very generous, I doubt any do, or not more than a handful.</p><p></p><p>"<em>Driving these goals were two simple principles: (1) Our job is to be good stewards of the game, and (2) the OGL exists for the benefit of the fans. Nothing about those principles has wavered for a second. </em>"</p><p></p><p>You failed miserably at the former, to the point that I do not believe the latter for even a second</p><p></p><p>"<em>That was why our early drafts of the new OGL included the provisions they did.</em>"</p><p></p><p>They were not early drafts, you sent them out to the major 3PPs, expecting a signature within a week. No draft would expect that</p><p></p><p>"<em>That means that other expressions, such as educational and charitable campaigns, livestreams, cosplay, VTT-uses, etc., will remain unaffected by any OGL update</em>"</p><p></p><p>good step</p><p></p><p>"<em>What it will not contain is any royalty structure.</em>"</p><p></p><p>good step</p><p></p><p>I am not seeing anything about not registering, not reporting income, throw those out too. Finally, make it perpetual and irrevocable and we are in business again <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mamba, post: 8894652, member: 7034611"] Quite a bit of backpedalling and revised history there "[I]When we initially conceived of revising the OGL, it was with three major goals in mind. First, we wanted the ability to prevent the use of D&D content from being included in hateful and discriminatory products. Second, we wanted to address those attempting to use D&D in web3, blockchain games, and NFTs[/I]" you could have accomplished that much simpler, you explicitly said print and PDF only, not even VTTs, the above list does not match that. "[I]And third, we wanted to ensure that the OGL is for the content creator, the homebrewer, the aspiring designer, our players, and the community—not major corporations to use for their own commercial and promotional purpose.[/I]" Define 'major', I am not seeing any major corporatrions here, and if a company manages to make 5-10M in D&D adjacent products, they do sell them to 'the community'. And that range is already very generous, I doubt any do, or not more than a handful. "[I]Driving these goals were two simple principles: (1) Our job is to be good stewards of the game, and (2) the OGL exists for the benefit of the fans. Nothing about those principles has wavered for a second. [/I]" You failed miserably at the former, to the point that I do not believe the latter for even a second "[I]That was why our early drafts of the new OGL included the provisions they did.[/I]" They were not early drafts, you sent them out to the major 3PPs, expecting a signature within a week. No draft would expect that "[I]That means that other expressions, such as educational and charitable campaigns, livestreams, cosplay, VTT-uses, etc., will remain unaffected by any OGL update[/I]" good step "[I]What it will not contain is any royalty structure.[/I]" good step I am not seeing anything about not registering, not reporting income, throw those out too. Finally, make it perpetual and irrevocable and we are in business again ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
WotC Walks Back Some OGL Changes, But Not All
Top