Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
WotC Walks Back Some OGL Changes, But Not All
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 8894816" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>If they want to do that, THEY CAN.</p><p></p><p>You don't need to nor even really benefit from deauthorizing the OGL 1.0a to do that. Let me lay it out so there's no confusion as to how it's done:</p><p></p><p>1) You create GSL 2.0. You clearly outline what you want. You can even put in a poison-pill clause re: OGL if you want, but I wouldn't recommend it. You leave the OGL 1.0a alone, it's irrelevant.</p><p></p><p>2) You provide clear carrots - for example, a large obvious badge saying "D&D compatible" not like "Creator Content" with no explanation or some bollocks.</p><p></p><p>3) You create a new 1D&D SRD. You clearly state that ONLY the GSL 2.0 lets you use this. No-one will mess with you on that.</p><p></p><p>That's it. Now you've achieved everything you were suggesting. You didn't need to blow up anything, you didn't cause a massive ruckus. You've clearly separated your brand from anyone else, you've "taken back control" (lol!) and so on.</p><p></p><p>But that's not WotC's actual goal, as evidenced by now essentially three different takes on the OGL - 1.1, 2.0, and whatever this is (it ain't 2.0). All of them are focused on destroying the OGL 1.0a. That's not all necessary to the goals you're suggesting, indeed it's a counter-productive.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 8894816, member: 18"] If they want to do that, THEY CAN. You don't need to nor even really benefit from deauthorizing the OGL 1.0a to do that. Let me lay it out so there's no confusion as to how it's done: 1) You create GSL 2.0. You clearly outline what you want. You can even put in a poison-pill clause re: OGL if you want, but I wouldn't recommend it. You leave the OGL 1.0a alone, it's irrelevant. 2) You provide clear carrots - for example, a large obvious badge saying "D&D compatible" not like "Creator Content" with no explanation or some bollocks. 3) You create a new 1D&D SRD. You clearly state that ONLY the GSL 2.0 lets you use this. No-one will mess with you on that. That's it. Now you've achieved everything you were suggesting. You didn't need to blow up anything, you didn't cause a massive ruckus. You've clearly separated your brand from anyone else, you've "taken back control" (lol!) and so on. But that's not WotC's actual goal, as evidenced by now essentially three different takes on the OGL - 1.1, 2.0, and whatever this is (it ain't 2.0). All of them are focused on destroying the OGL 1.0a. That's not all necessary to the goals you're suggesting, indeed it's a counter-productive. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
WotC Walks Back Some OGL Changes, But Not All
Top