Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="DaveMage" data-source="post: 8894979" data-attributes="member: 10447">So....for lawyers on this thread - is it possible that any OGC released up to this point could be declared as open content by the license that Paizo's lawfirm is developing?  For example, could the new license state that any open content that was perpetual as declared by OGL 1.0a remain perpetual under the new license - even though the new license was created by another entity?  Essentially - can perpetual open content released under one license be considered as perpetual under a new license - even though the original license itself is no longer "authorized"?I'm guessing something like this has rarely, if ever, been tested.</blockquote>